Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
1232132112
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
t1 vs t2
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
t1
var customer_no = "1232132132112,"; var chk_no = "1232132132112" + ","; customer_no.concat(chk_no);
t2
var customer_no = "1232132132112,"; var chk_no = "1232132132112" + ","; customer_no += chk_no;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
t1
t2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the JavaScript microbenchmark you provided. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches for concatenating strings in JavaScript: using the `concat()` method and using the `+` operator with string interpolation. **Options Compared** There are only two options compared in this benchmark: 1. **Using `concat()`**: This approach uses the `concat()` method to concatenate two strings. 2. **Using `+` operator with string interpolation**: This approach uses the `+` operator to concatenate two strings, where one of the strings is enclosed in quotes. **Pros and Cons** * Using `concat()`: + Pros: Easy to read and maintain, explicit concatenation, can be used for non-string data types. + Cons: Can lead to slower performance due to the creation of intermediate objects. * Using `+` operator with string interpolation: + Pros: Often faster than `concat()`, can be more concise. + Cons: Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully, as the interpolation syntax may not work as expected. **Other Considerations** In modern JavaScript, using templates literals (introduced in ECMAScript 2015) would likely outperform both of these approaches. Templates literals allow for more readable and efficient string concatenation: ```javascript const result = `${customer_no}${chk_no}`; ``` However, since this feature was not used in the benchmark, we'll focus on the `concat()` and `+` operator approaches. **Library Usage** There is no library usage in these benchmarks. The code snippets only use built-in JavaScript functions and operators. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmarks. However, it's worth noting that some older browsers may not support the `+` operator with string interpolation or templates literals. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to measure string concatenation performance, consider using other benchmarking tools like: * V8 Benchmark Suite (a set of microbenchmarks for JavaScript engines) * jsPerf (a web-based benchmarking tool for JavaScript) * Microbenchmarking libraries like `micro-benchmark` or `Benchmark.js` Keep in mind that the choice of benchmarking tool will depend on your specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
string-hashcode
string-hashcode2
string-hashcode3
Square Every Digit
Square Every Digit, but with toString()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?