Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
overwrite object properties
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
spread vs object.assign
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
spread
const object = { name: 'James', age: 32 } const newObject = { ...object, age: 33 }
object.assign
const object = { name: 'James', age: 32 } const newObject = Object.assign({}, object, {age: 33})
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread
object.assign
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of JavaScript microbenchmarks like this one is crucial to understand how different approaches impact execution speed. The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between two methods to update object properties: 1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This method uses the spread operator to create a new object with the properties of `object`, and then updates the `age` property. 2. **Object.assign()**: This method creates a shallow copy of `object` using `Object.assign()`, and then merges the updated `age` value into it. **Pros and Cons:** * **Spread Operator (`...`)**: * Pros: * More concise and readable code. * Fewer lines of code compared to Object.assign(). * Faster performance since it avoids the overhead of function calls. * Cons: * Less flexible, as it only allows spreading from one source object. * **Object.assign()**: * Pros: * More flexible and powerful, allowing for merging multiple objects. * Easier to chain method calls (e.g., assigning multiple properties at once). * Cons: * Slightly slower performance due to the overhead of function calls. In general, if you need to update a single property, the spread operator is likely a better choice due to its conciseness and readability. However, if you need to merge multiple objects or perform more complex updates, Object.assign() might be a better fit. The benchmark results show that both methods have similar performance on this specific test case, but the spread operator outperforms Object.assign() in terms of executions per second. **Other Alternatives:** 1. **Destructuring Assignment**: This method uses destructuring assignment to extract properties from `object` and then updates the new object with the updated value. 2. **Object Spread Syntax (2015)**: This syntax, introduced in ECMAScript 2015, allows for more concise way of creating a new object with spread properties. These alternatives are not included in this benchmark, but they might be worth exploring in future microbenchmarks to compare their performance. **Library Usage:** In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly used. However, some JavaScript engines, like V8 (used by Chrome), may have internal optimizations or implementation details that could affect the results.
Related benchmarks:
The grand dictionary property accessor schema
Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor().value vs Reflect.get()
in vs hasOwnProperty
Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor().value vs Reflect.getOwnPropertyDescriptor()
defineProperty descriptor configurable
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?