Benchmark: some vs foreach vs flatten

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.11/lodash.min.js"></script>

Tests:

foreach
const record = { subscriptions: [{ events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'wf', ], }, { events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'wf', ], }, { events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'wf', ], }, { events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'aa', ], }, ], }; const isSubscribed = (subscriptionRecord, eventType) => { const { subscriptions } = subscriptionRecord; const events = []; subscriptions.forEach(s => { events.push(...s.events); }); return _.includes(events, eventType); }; const result = isSubscribed(record, 'aa');
flatten
const record = { subscriptions: [{ events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'wf', ], }, { events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'wf', ], }, { events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'wf', ], }, { events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'aa', ], }, ], }; const isSubscribed3 = (subscriptionRecord, eventType) => { const events = _.flatten(subscriptionRecord.subscriptions.map(s => s.events)) return _.includes(events, eventType); }; const result = isSubscribed3(record, 'aa');
some
const record = { subscriptions: [{ events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'wf', ], }, { events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'wf', ], }, { events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'wf', ], }, { events: [ 'df', 'ff', 'gf', 'hf', 'rf', 'aa', ], }, ], }; const isSubscribed2 = (subscriptionRecord, eventType) => { return _.some(subscriptionRecord.subscriptions, sub => _.includes(sub.events, eventType)) }; const t = isSubscribed2(record, 'aa');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
foreach
flatten
some

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares three different approaches to check if an event is subscribed to a subscription record:

1. `forEach`
2. `flatten` (using Lodash)
3. `some`

**Options Compared**

* `forEach`: uses the `forEach` method of arrays to iterate over the events in each subscription.
	+ Pros: simple, straightforward approach.
	+ Cons: can be slow if the number of events is large, as it requires creating an array and iterating over it.
* `flatten` (using Lodash): uses the `flatten` function from Lodash to flatten the arrays of events in each subscription.
	+ Pros: can be faster than `forEach`, as it avoids creating arrays and iterating over them. Also, Lodash is a popular library with a wide range of utility functions.
	+ Cons: requires loading an external library (Lodash), which may add overhead.
* `some`: uses the `some` method of arrays to iterate over the events in each subscription.
	+ Pros: similar to `forEach`, but more concise and expressive.
	+ Cons: same pros and cons as `forEach`.

**Library Used**

The benchmark uses Lodash, a popular JavaScript library that provides a wide range of utility functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string manipulation, and more. In this case, the `flatten` function is used to flatten the arrays of events in each subscription.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

None mentioned in the benchmark definition.

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmark uses Firefox 95 as the browser, which may impact the results due to the specific implementation of the browser.
* The benchmark measures the executions per second, which is a good metric for measuring performance. However, it's worth noting that this metric can be affected by factors such as CPU frequency and memory usage.

**Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some options:

* `reduce`: instead of using `forEach` or `some`, you could use the `reduce` method to iterate over the events in each subscription.
* Custom implementation: if you want to avoid using external libraries like Lodash, you could implement a custom solution using plain JavaScript.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and may require more code to implement.

Related benchmarks:

some vs foreach vs flatten (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: foreach vs flatten vs some

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

foreach

flatten

some

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):