Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
without vs filter
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
without lodash vs native filter
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = ['loh1', 'loh2', 'loh3', 'loh4', 'loh5', 'loh6', 'loh7', 'loh8', 'loh9'];
Tests:
without lodash
_.without(arr, 'loh5');
native filter
arr.filter(i => i !== 'loh5');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
without lodash
native filter
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark defines two test cases: 1. `_.without(arr, 'loh5');` - This test case uses the Lodash library to create an array without the specified element (`'loh5'`) using the `_without` function. 2. `arr.filter(i => i !== 'loh5');` - This test case creates an array filter that excludes elements with the value `'loh5'`. **Options Compared** The benchmark is comparing two approaches: 1. **Using Lodash library**: The first test case uses the Lodash library to perform the filtering. 2. **Native JavaScript implementation**: The second test case performs the filtering using native JavaScript. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Lodash Library:** Pros: * More concise code (e.g., `_without(arr, 'loh5')`) * Often optimized for performance by Lodash * Easier to read and maintain Cons: * Requires including an external library in the test HTML file * May introduce additional dependencies or overhead **Native JavaScript Implementation:** Pros: * No dependency on an external library * Optimized for specific use cases (e.g., filtering) * Can be more efficient in terms of memory usage Cons: * More verbose code (e.g., `arr.filter(i => i !== 'loh5')`) * May require more complex logic to handle edge cases **Library - Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides a comprehensive set of functions for various tasks, including array manipulation, string manipulation, and more. The `_without` function in this benchmark is used to create an array without the specified element. In general, using libraries like Lodash can be beneficial when: * You need to perform complex operations on data * You want to write concise code with a focus on readability * You're working with large datasets or performance-critical applications However, including external libraries may introduce additional dependencies and overhead, which can impact performance. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax that requires explanation. The focus is on the comparison of two approaches: using a library (Lodash) versus native JavaScript implementation.
Related benchmarks:
lodash vs es6 in filter method
Lodash.filter vs Lodash.without
Lodash.filter vs Lodash.without vs array.filter
Lodash filter VS native filter (with Lodash actually loaded)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?