Benchmark: is find arrays cached

Script Preparation code:

var data = Array(1000).fill().map((_, id) => ({
    id,
    name: `${id}_name`
}));
var data2 = Array(1000).fill().map((_, id) => ({
    id,
    name: `${id}_name`
}));

Tests:

single find (500)
const found = data.find((item) => item.id === 500); const result = { id: found?.id, name: found?.name, };
double same find (500)
const result = { id: data.find((item) => item.id === 500)?.id, name: data.find((item) => item.id === 500)?.name, };
double different find (500)
const result = { id: data.find((item) => item.id === 500)?.id, name: data2.find((item) => item.id === 500)?.name, };
single find (100)
const found = data.find((item) => item.id === 100); const result = { id: found?.id, name: found?.name, }
double same find (100)
const result = { id: data.find((item) => item.id === 100)?.id, name: data.find((item) => item.id === 100)?.name, };
double different find (100)
const result = { id: data.find((item) => item.id === 100)?.id, name: data2.find((item) => item.id === 100)?.name, };

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
single find (500)
double same find (500)
double different find (500)
single find (100)
double same find (100)
double different find (100)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

is find arrays cached (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: single find (500) vs double same find (500) vs double different find (500) vs single find (100) vs double same find (100) vs double different find (100)

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

single find (500)

double same find (500)

double different find (500)

single find (100)

double same find (100)

double different find (100)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results