Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test forin
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
for in vs object keys vs for in object keys
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var obj = { 'a': 1, 'b': 1, 'c': 1, 'd': 1, 'e': 1, 'f': 1, 'g': 1 };
Tests:
for in
for (var i=10000; i > 0; i--) { for (var key in obj) { console.log(key); } }
object keys
for (var i=10000; i > 0; i--) { Object.keys(obj).forEach(key => console.log(key)); }
for in object keys
for (var i = 0, keys = Object.keys(obj); i < keys.length; i++) { console.log(keys[i]) }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for in
object keys
for in object keys
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**What is being tested on MeasureThat.net?** MeasureThat.net measures the performance of JavaScript microbenchmarks, specifically in the context of iterating over object properties using different methods. **Options compared:** Three options are compared: 1. **For-in loop**: The traditional `for-in` loop uses `in` keyword to iterate over an object's own property names. 2. **Object.keys() method**: The `Object.keys()` method returns an array of a given object's own property names, which can then be iterated using various methods such as `forEach`. 3. **Array-like iteration with object keys**: This approach uses the length of the object's `keys` property and iterates over it directly. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **For-in loop**: * Pros: Simple and straightforward, well-suited for iterating over objects with non-enumerable properties. * Cons: Can be slower due to unnecessary iterations over non-existent properties. 2. **Object.keys() method**: * Pros: Efficient and modern approach, suitable for most use cases. * Cons: May be slower than the traditional `for-in` loop in some cases, as it involves creating an array of property names. 3. **Array-like iteration with object keys**: * Pros: Similar performance to the Object.keys() method, with the added benefit of direct access to property values. * Cons: Less readable and less common than using the Object.keys() method. **Library usage:** None of the benchmark definitions explicitly use any external libraries. However, the use of `Object.keys()` implies that the JavaScript engine being tested is able to provide an optimized implementation for this method. **Special JS features/syntax:** None of the benchmark definitions use any special or advanced JavaScript features such as ES6 syntax, async/await, or Web Workers. The code uses standard ECMAScript 5 syntax and should be compatible with most modern browsers. **Other alternatives:** If you want to test other iteration methods, MeasureThat.net provides a few options: * Using `for...in` with the `hasOwnProperty()` method to filter out non-enumerable properties. * Iterating over object property names using the `Object.getOwnPropertyNames()` method (not available in all browsers). * Using the `Map` data structure instead of objects for iteration. You can add these alternatives by modifying the benchmark definitions and providing new test cases. Keep in mind that each alternative may have different performance characteristics, so it's essential to test them thoroughly.
Related benchmarks:
For in vs For of
Object speard vs assign
typeof first or second
dxcsxfr
in vs not undefined
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?