Benchmark: 465068be-f8a4-4d13-b705-b4ce84dbe236s

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.obj = {};

Tests:

Object.keys
Object.keys(window.obj).length === 0;
_.isEmpty
_.isEmpty(window.obj);
custom case
function isObjectEmpty(obj) { for (let prop in obj) { if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) { return false; } } return true; } isObjectEmpty(window.obj);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Object.keys
_.isEmpty
custom case

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.

**Benchmark Overview**

MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. A microbenchmark is a small, specific piece of code that measures the performance of a particular aspect of a programming language or library.

The provided JSON represents a benchmark with three individual test cases:

1. `Object.keys(window.obj).length === 0;`
2. `_.isEmpty(window.obj);` (using Lodash library)
3. A custom case using a function `isObjectEmpty(obj)` to check if an object is empty

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares different approaches to achieve the same result:

1. **Native JavaScript**: Using the built-in `Object.keys()` method to get the keys of an object and checking if its length is 0.
2. **Lodash library**: Using the `_.isEmpty()` function from Lodash, which provides a more concise way to check if an object is empty.
3. **Custom implementation**: Writing a custom function `isObjectEmpty(obj)` using a for...in loop to iterate over the object's properties and checking if any of them have a corresponding value.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

1. **Native JavaScript**:
	* Pros: No external dependencies, easy to understand, and optimized for performance.
	* Cons: May not be as concise or readable as other approaches.
2. **Lodash library**:
	* Pros: Provides a concise way to check if an object is empty, eliminates the need to write boilerplate code.
	* Cons: Requires an external dependency (Lodash), may have additional overhead due to function call and lookup.
3. **Custom implementation**:
	* Pros: Provides full control over the logic, can be optimized for specific use cases.
	* Cons: More verbose, requires more mental effort to understand and maintain.

**Library - Lodash**

The `_.isEmpty()` function from Lodash is a utility function that takes an object as input and returns a boolean indicating whether the object is empty. The implementation uses a simple check:

`return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;`

This function is designed to be efficient and performant, making it a good choice for many use cases.

**Special JS Feature - For...in Loop**

The custom case using `for...in` loop is an example of a special JavaScript feature. The `for...in` loop allows iterating over the properties of an object, which can be useful in certain scenarios. However, it's worth noting that this approach may not be as efficient or concise as other methods.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives to measure performance include:

1. **Benchmarking frameworks**: Such as BenchmarkJS, which provides a simple and standardized way to write benchmarks.
2. **Profiling tools**: Like Chrome DevTools or Node.js Inspector, which can provide detailed information about the performance of your code.
3. **Microbenchmarking libraries**: Such as micro-benchmark, which provides a lightweight and easy-to-use API for writing microbenchmarks.

In conclusion, MeasureThat.net's benchmark provides a useful insight into the performance characteristics of different approaches to checking if an object is empty. By understanding the pros and cons of each approach, developers can make informed decisions about how to optimize their code for specific use cases.

Related benchmarks:

465068be-f8a4-4d13-b705-b4ce84dbe236s (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Object.keys vs _.isEmpty vs custom case

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Object.keys

_.isEmpty

custom case

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):