Benchmark: Shallow clone array of objects

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {
  description: 'a',
  myNumber: 123456789,
  myBoolean: true,
};

var array = [obj, obj, obj];

Tests:

Lodash clone
result = _.clone(array);
Spread operator
result = [...array];

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash clone
Spread operator

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

**Benchmark Definition:**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark for measuring the performance of two different methods for creating a shallow clone of an array of objects.

The **Script Preparation Code** defines a simple object `obj` with three properties: `description`, `myNumber`, and `myBoolean`. This object is then used to create an array containing multiple copies of `obj`.

The **Html Preparation Code** includes a reference to the Lodash library, which provides a utility function for cloning arrays.

**Options being compared:**

Two options are being compared:

1. **Lodash clone**: Using the `_` object from the Lodash library to create a shallow clone of the array using the `clone()` method.
2. **Spread operator**: Using the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array by spreading the elements of the original array.

**Pros and cons of each approach:**

1. **Lodash clone**:
	* Pros:
		+ Provides a consistent and efficient way to create shallow clones of arrays.
		+ Utilizes the Lodash library, which is widely used and well-maintained.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires an additional library dependency (Lodash).
		+ May incur a small overhead due to the library's initialization.
2. **Spread operator**:
	* Pros:
		+ Does not require any external libraries or dependencies.
		+ Is a standard JavaScript feature, so it's widely supported across browsers and platforms.
	* Cons:
		+ Can be slower than using Lodash for cloning large arrays due to the overhead of creating new objects.

**Other considerations:**

When choosing between these two approaches, consider the trade-offs between performance, simplicity, and maintainability. If you need a consistent and efficient way to create shallow clones of arrays, the Lodash clone method might be a better choice. However, if you're working with small to medium-sized arrays and prioritize simplicity, the spread operator method could be sufficient.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two different approaches for creating shallow clones of arrays using established libraries (Lodash) and standard JavaScript features (the spread operator).

**Library usage:**

The Lodash library is used to provide a utility function for cloning arrays (`clone()` method). Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for working with data structures, including arrays.

**Alternatives:**

If you're interested in exploring other alternatives for creating shallow clones of arrays, consider the following options:

1. **Array.prototype.slice()**: This method creates a shallow copy of an array by returning a new array object containing references to the original elements.
2. **Array.prototype.map()**: This method creates a new array with the results of applying a provided function to each element in the original array.
3. **Array.prototype.reduce()**: This method applies a reduction function to each element in the original array, which can be used to create a shallow clone.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might not offer the same level of performance or consistency as using Lodash or the spread operator.

Related benchmarks:

Shallow clone array of objects (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash clone vs Spread operator

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash clone

Spread operator

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):