Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
double-bang-vs-boolean-cast2
(version: 0)
!!x vs Boolean(x)
Comparing performance of:
!!0 vs Boolean(0)
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
!!0
!!0
Boolean(0)
Boolean(0)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
!!0
Boolean(0)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark being tested. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is testing two different ways of evaluating the expression `!!x` in JavaScript, which is equivalent to `true` or `false` depending on the value of `x`. The two methods being compared are: 1. Using the double-bang operator (`!!`) 2. Using a `Boolean()` cast **Options compared** The benchmark is comparing these two approaches to evaluate the expression `!!x`, where `x` is either `0` or another non-zero value. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **Double-bang operator (`!!`)** * Pros: + Brief and concise syntax + Faster execution, as it's a single operator * Cons: + May be less readable for some developers + Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully (e.g., `!!null` returns `true`, while `Boolean(null)` returns `false`) 2. **Boolean() cast** * Pros: + More explicit and readable syntax + Easier to understand the intent of the code * Cons: + Longer execution time, as it involves a function call **Library usage** None of the benchmark tests use any external libraries. **Special JavaScript features or syntax** The test case uses the double-bang operator (`!!`), which is a shorthand for `typeof x !== 'undefined' && x`. This feature is not widely used and may not be familiar to all developers. **Other alternatives** In general, when evaluating expressions like `!!x`, you can also use other approaches, such as: * Using the `Number()` function: `Number(x) === 1` (note that this requires a value of exactly `1` for a true result) * Using a conditional statement: `if (x) { /* code here */ }` * Using a ternary operator: `x ? true : false` However, the double-bang operator (`!!`) and the Boolean() cast are two common and widely used approaches to achieve this. **Benchmark preparation code** The benchmark preparation code is empty in this case, which means that no specific setup or initialization is required before running the benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Ramda vs. Lodash 2
Ramda vs. Lodash (Fixed & IIFE updated asc)
floor() vs trunc() vs bitwise hacks (~~, >> 0, etc) 2
Ramda vs. Lodash mmm
Ramda (/w transducer) vs. Lodash v2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?