Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Switch vs Object Literal (2)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Switch vs Object Literal
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = '123'; str = str.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * 3));
Tests:
Switch
switch (+str) { case 1: console.log('A'); break; case 2: console.log('B'); break; case 3: console.log('C'); break; }
Object Literal
var objLiteral = { 1: function() { console.log('A'); }, 2: function() { console.log('B'); }, 3: function() { console.log('C'); } } objLiteral[+str]();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Switch
Object Literal
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that provides details about the test. In this case, there are two benchmarks: 1. "Switch vs Object Literal (2)" 2. The second one is not explicitly defined in the JSON, but based on the individual test cases, we can infer it's another comparison between switch and an alternative approach. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is a JavaScript snippet that is executed before running each benchmark: ```javascript var str = '123'; str = str.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * 3)); ``` This code generates a random string (`'123'`) and then replaces the first character with one of three possible characters ('A', 'B', or 'C') using `charAt()` and `Math.floor()`. The resulting value is stored in the `str` variable. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. "Switch": ```javascript switch (+str) { case 1: console.log('A'); break; case 2: console.log('B'); break; case 3: console.log('C'); break; } ``` This test case uses a `switch` statement with the value of `str` as its condition. The `+` operator is used to convert `str` to an integer, allowing it to match against the integer values in the `case` statements. 2. "Object Literal": ```javascript var objLiteral = { 1: function() { console.log('A'); }, 2: function() { console.log('B'); }, 3: function() { console.log('C'); } } objLiteral[+str](); ``` This test case uses an object literal (`objLiteral`) with three properties that are functions. The value of `str` is used to index into the object and execute the corresponding function. **What's being tested?** The benchmark is testing the performance difference between two approaches: 1. **Switch statement**: This approach uses a traditional `switch` statement with integer values. 2. **Object Literal**: This approach uses an object literal with functions as properties, where the value of `str` is used to index into the object. **Options being compared** The benchmark is comparing these two alternatives. **Pros and Cons** **Switch Statement:** Pros: * Familiar and widely supported syntax * Easy to understand and maintain Cons: * Can be slower due to the overhead of evaluating a condition * May have performance issues if not optimized correctly (e.g., using `===` instead of `==`) **Object Literal:** Pros: * Can provide more flexibility and expressiveness, especially for complex logic * Can avoid some of the overhead associated with traditional switch statements Cons: * May be less familiar to developers who are not experienced with this syntax * Requires careful consideration of how to structure the object literal and index into it efficiently **Other Considerations** * The benchmark is using `+str` to convert `str` to an integer, which may have performance implications. * The test cases are generating random strings, which can affect the results. **Library/Functions Used** None that are specific to this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that object literals and switch statements are built-in JavaScript constructs, so no external libraries are required. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There is one special feature: the `+` operator is used to convert `str` to an integer. This is a common idiom in JavaScript for converting strings to numbers.
Related benchmarks:
Number vs + vs parseFloat
Number vs + vs parseInt
Number.parseFloat vs parseFloat
parseFloat vs Number.parseFloat
Number vs + vs parseFloat 23
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?