Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
match vs endsWith
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
endsWith vs regex
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
endsWith
"abc".endsWith("abc")
regex
"abc".match(/abc/gi)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
endsWith
regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, the options compared, pros and cons of each approach, and other considerations. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark is comparing two approaches to test if a string contains "abc": 1. `endsWith` method: This checks if a string ends with a specific substring. 2. Regular Expression (regex) using the `.match()` method: This uses a regular expression pattern to search for the substring in the entire string. **Options Compared** The benchmark is comparing two approaches: 1. **`endsWith` method**: This is a built-in JavaScript method that checks if a string ends with a specific substring. 2. **Regular Expression (regex)** using the `.match()` method: This uses a regular expression pattern to search for the substring in the entire string. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **`endsWith` method**: * Pros: + Fast and efficient, since it only checks the last few characters of the string. + Easy to understand and use. * Cons: + Only works for strings that end with the specified substring. + May be slower than regex for longer strings or more complex patterns. 2. **Regular Expression (regex) using `.match()`**: + Pros: - Can match any character sequence, not just a fixed ending. - Flexible and powerful pattern matching. * Cons: - Can be slower than `endsWith` due to the overhead of compiling and executing regex patterns. - May be more complex to read and understand. **Library Used** None, as both approaches are built-in JavaScript methods. However, the benchmark does use a regular expression syntax (`/abc/gi`) which is not specific to any library, but rather a standard part of JavaScript's regex API. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark uses no special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is considered "standard" in JavaScript (e.g., `endsWith`, `.match()`, regex patterns). **Other Considerations** When choosing between these approaches, consider the following: * Performance: If speed is critical and you're working with short strings, `endsWith` may be a better choice. * Flexibility: If you need to match more complex patterns or substrings, regex using `.match()` may be a better option. * Readability: Choose the approach that makes your code easier to read and understand. **Alternative Approaches** Other alternatives for this benchmark might include: 1. **`startsWith` method**: A built-in JavaScript method that checks if a string starts with a specific substring. 2. **Using a custom implementation**: Depending on your specific requirements, you might consider implementing a custom solution using JavaScript's `String.prototype.indexOf()` or other methods. In summary, the benchmark is comparing two approaches to test if a string contains "abc": the built-in `endsWith` method and regular expression using the `.match()` method. The choice between these approaches depends on performance, flexibility, readability, and specific use case requirements.
Related benchmarks:
endsWith() vs regex
match vs endsWith vs includes
endsWith vs Regex-literal
endsWith vs Regex aspx
endsWith vs Regex aspx ending
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?