Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash vs es6 - filter then includes method4
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash filter then includes method vs es6 filter then includes method
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var array = new Array(10000).fill().map((v, i) => i);
Tests:
lodash filter then includes method
var result = _.chain(array).map((v) => v + 1) .filter((v) => v % 3 === 0) .slice(0, 10).value();
es6 filter then includes method
var result = array.map((v) => v + 1) .filter((v) => v % 3 === 0) .slice(0, 10);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash filter then includes method
es6 filter then includes method
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested. **Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to filtering and including elements in an array using the `filter` method. The test cases are designed to measure performance differences between using Lodash (a popular JavaScript utility library) versus native JavaScript syntax. **Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **Lodash filter then includes method**: This test case uses the `_.chain()` function from Lodash to chain together three operations: * `map((v) => v + 1)` increments each element in the array by 1. * `filter((v) => v % 3 === 0)` filters out elements that are not multiples of 3. * `slice(0, 10).value()` returns the first 10 elements that passed the filter. 2. **ES6 filter then includes method**: This test case uses native JavaScript syntax to perform the same operations as the Lodash version: * `array.map((v) => v + 1)` increments each element in the array by 1. * `filter((v) => v % 3 === 0)` filters out elements that are not multiples of 3. * `slice(0, 10)` returns a new array with the first 10 elements. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a comprehensive set of functions for various tasks, including: + Array manipulation (e.g., `map`, `filter`, `reduce`) + String manipulation (e.g., `trim`, `replace`, `split`) + Object manipulation (e.g., `merge`, `pick`, `assign`) + Function manipulation (e.g., `bind`, `curry`, `debounce`) In this benchmark, Lodash is used to chain together three operations using the `_.chain()` function. **Special JS Feature/ Syntax** There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax explicitly mentioned in the provided data. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript features, like async/await or Promises, might be used implicitly when working with callbacks or promises returned by functions like `map` and `filter`. **Other Alternatives** If you want to compare performance between Lodash and native JavaScript syntax for filtering and including elements in an array, you could also consider using other alternatives like: + Other utility libraries (e.g., Ramda) + Built-in JavaScript methods from earlier versions of the language + Custom implementations using vanilla JavaScript Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics depending on the specific use case and environment. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: * **Lodash (chain method)**: + Pros: Can simplify code, especially for complex operations; often more readable. + Cons: Might introduce additional overhead due to the function call chain. * **Native JavaScript syntax**: + Pros: Typically faster and more efficient; can be optimized using SIMD instructions or other native optimizations. + Cons: Requires more manual effort to manage the logic; might lead to more complex code. Ultimately, the choice between Lodash and native JavaScript syntax depends on your specific needs, performance requirements, and personal preferences.
Related benchmarks:
lodash v native filter
lodash vs es6 - filter then includes method
lodash vs es6 - filter then includes method3
Array.prototype.filter vs Lodash 4.17.5 filter
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?