Benchmark: Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomanceasd

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="nhngodo">Hi! NHNgodo!</div>

Script Preparation code:

/*use this block to define your objects and
 stuff which has to be done for every test block
for example: 'var testObject = {a: 3, b: 2}'*/
var actions = [{}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}, {}];
var dosmth = [];
var statusList = ['test'];

Tests:

in
let actionlength = actions.length; for (var i = 0; i < actionlength; i++) { let action = actions[i]; if((action.status in statusList)==false){ dosmth.push('1'); } }
jquery
let actionlength = actions.length; for (var i = 0; i < actionlength; i++) { let action = actions[i]; if((jQuery.isEmptyObject(statusList) == false) ){ dosmth.push('1'); }}
includes
let actionlength = actions.length; for (var i = 0; i < actionlength; i++) { let action = actions[i]; if(!statusList.includes(action.status)){ dosmth.push('1'); } }
orig
let actionlength = actions.length; for (var i = 0; i < actionlength; i++) { let action = actions[i]; if(jQuery.isEmptyObject(statusList) == false && (action.status in statusList)==false){ dosmth.push('1'); } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
in
jquery
includes
orig

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark defines two scripts: Vanilla JS and JQuery DOM. The script preparation code is empty, indicating that the user wants to test the performance difference between these two scripts without any additional functionality. The HTML preparation code includes a jQuery library, suggesting that the user wants to test the performance impact of using jQuery.

**Individual Test Cases**

The benchmark consists of four individual test cases:

1. **in**: This test case uses the `in` operator to check if an object property exists in another object.
2. **jquery**: This test case uses jQuery's `isEmptyObject()` function to check if a list is empty.
3. **includes**: This test case uses the `includes()` method to check if a value exists in an array.
4. **orig**: This test case combines elements of both `in` and `jquery`, using the `in` operator followed by `isEmptyObject()`.

**Library: jQuery**

jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides a simplified way to interact with the DOM. In this benchmark, jQuery's `isEmptyObject()` function is used to check if an object is empty. This suggests that the user wants to test the performance impact of using jQuery's built-in functions versus native JavaScript methods.

**Special JS Features**

None of these test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would be specific to a particular browser or implementation.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

* **in operator**: Fast and lightweight, but may not work well with complex objects.
* **includes() method**: More efficient than the `in` operator for arrays, but may require additional operations to optimize performance.
* **isEmptyObject() function**: Specific to jQuery, which may introduce additional overhead due to the library's complexity.

**Other Considerations**

When testing performance in JavaScript, it's essential to consider factors like:

* Cache locality: How often are objects being accessed and modified?
* Array sizes: Are arrays growing or shrinking during the test?
* Loop unrolling: Can loop iterations be optimized for better performance?

**Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative benchmarks, here are a few options:

1. **V8 Benchmark Suite**: A set of benchmarking tests designed to measure the performance of JavaScript engines.
2. **WebPageTest**: A tool that measures web page load times and can be used to compare the performance of different scripts.
3. **Benchmarking libraries like Jest or AVA**: These libraries provide built-in support for running benchmarking tests and can help simplify the process.

Keep in mind that each benchmark has its own strengths and weaknesses, and choosing the right one depends on your specific use case and requirements.

Related benchmarks:

Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomanceasd (version: 0)

Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance

Comparing performance of: in vs jquery vs includes vs orig

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

in

jquery

includes

orig

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):