Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
uuidv4 vs custom date
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
uuid vs date
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://unpkg.com/uuid@latest/dist/umd/uuidv4.min.js"></script>
Tests:
uuid
uuidv4();
date
`${Date.now()}${Math.round(Math.random() * 1e3)}`;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
uuid
date
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of each approach. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined in JSON format, which includes: * `Name`: The name of the benchmark, which is "uuidv4 vs custom date". * `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These fields are empty, indicating that no additional setup code is required for the benchmark. * `Benchmark Definition`: This field defines the JavaScript code to be executed in each test case. It's a simple function call (`uuidv4()`) followed by another test case with a custom date generation code (`"${Date.now()}${Math.round(Math.random() * 1e3)}"`). **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: * `Test Name: "uuid"`: This test case simply calls the `uuidv4()` function and measures its execution time. * `Test Name: "date"`: This test case generates a custom date using the `Date.now()` and `Math.random()` functions, followed by some additional math operations. **Comparison** The benchmark compares two approaches: 1. **`uuidv4()`**: The `uuidv4()` function is part of the UUID (Universally Unique Identifier) library, which generates a random 128-bit UUID. 2. **Custom Date Generation (`Date.now() + Math.round(Math.random() * 1e3)`)**: This custom date generation code uses the current timestamp in milliseconds (`Date.now()`) and adds some randomness to it using `Math.random()`. **Pros and Cons** * **`uuidv4()`**: + Pros: - Fast execution time, as it's a pure function call. - Guaranteed uniqueness of generated UUIDs. + Cons: - May require additional libraries or setup for the UUID library to be included in the benchmark. - Could potentially have slower execution times due to overhead from external libraries. * **Custom Date Generation**: + Pros: - Simple and easy to understand code. - Potentially faster execution times, as it's a built-in function call with no external library dependencies. + Cons: - May not be suitable for applications requiring truly random dates (e.g., security-critical systems). - Can produce predictable date ranges if the randomness factor is set too high. **Library: UUID Library** The `uuidv4()` function is part of the [UUID](https://github.com/mikaelvelasquez/node-uuid) library, which provides a simple and efficient way to generate random UUIDs. The library is included in the benchmark through the `<script src="...">` tag. **Special JS Feature: Date.now()** The `Date.now()` function returns the number of milliseconds elapsed since January 1, 1970 (UTC), at 00:00:00 GMT. This function is built-in to JavaScript and does not require any special setup or features. In summary, the benchmark compares two approaches for generating unique identifiers: using a pre-built UUID library (`uuidv4()`) versus a custom date generation code. The choice between these approaches depends on performance requirements, application security considerations, and personal preference.
Related benchmarks:
UUID perf test
create_UUID
create_UUID.
Test uuidv1 vs uuidv4
UUID Generation 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?