Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
compound let assignment
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Compound let vs Let vs Compound var
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Compound let
for (let a = 0; a < 10000000; a++) { a += 1; }
Let
for (let a = 0; a < 10000000; a++) { a = a + 1; }
Compound var
for (var a = 0; a < 10000000; a++) { a += 1; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Compound let
Let
Compound var
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's being tested in this specific benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a microbenchmark that measures the performance of three different approaches to incrementing a variable in a `for` loop. The goal is to compare the execution times of these approaches across various browsers, devices, and operating systems. **Benchmarked Approaches** There are three test cases: 1. **Compound let**: `let a = 0; for (a++) { /* */ }` 2. **Let**: `let a = 0; for (a += 1) { /* */ }` 3. **Compound var**: `var a = 0; for (a += 1) { /* */ }` **Comparison of Approaches** Each approach has its pros and cons: * **Compound let**: This approach increments the variable in a single statement, which can lead to better compiler optimization. However, it may not be supported by older browsers or versions. * **Let**: This is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It's a good choice when you need to declare variables in multiple places within the same scope. However, some older browsers might not support this syntax. * **Compound var**: This approach increments the variable in two separate statements, which can lead to slower execution times due to the overhead of re-declaration. **Library and Special Features** There are no libraries mentioned in the provided benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may optimize JavaScript code using Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation, which can affect the performance of these microbenchmarks. The **let** keyword is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for variable declarations outside of function bodies and is a good alternative to the traditional `var` declaration. This feature provides better scoping and re-declaration behavior compared to traditional `var`. **Other Considerations** When writing microbenchmarks, it's essential to consider factors like: * **Browser support**: Make sure your benchmark supports a wide range of browsers and versions. * **Device platform**: Test your benchmark on various devices (desktop, mobile) to ensure consistent results. * **Operating system**: Include multiple operating systems in your test suite for more accurate comparisons. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for writing microbenchmarks include: * **Benchmark.js**: A popular benchmarking library that supports a wide range of browsers and platforms. * **Benchpress**: Another well-known benchmarking library that's easy to use and provides detailed results. * **Snyk**: A security-focused benchmarking platform that also provides performance testing capabilities.
Related benchmarks:
multiply integer
let vs const in tight loops
let or without let
let or without let (2)
let or without let (3)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?