Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
let vs var
(version: 0)
let vs var
Comparing performance of:
a vs b
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src=''></script>
Script Preparation code:
var lt = 0; var vt = 0;
Tests:
a
for(var i=0; i<1000; i++){ var a = 0; lt++; }
b
for(var i=0; i<1000; i++){ let a = 0; vt++; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
a
b
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **What is being tested?** The benchmark compares two approaches to declare variables in JavaScript: `let` vs `var`. Specifically, it tests the execution speed of incrementing a variable using these two different keywords. **Options compared:** * `let`: declared with the `let` keyword * `var`: declared with the `var` keyword **Pros and Cons:** * **Let**: Pros: + Block scope, which means the variable is only accessible within the block it's declared in. + No hoisting, meaning the assignment operation is not moved to the top of the scope. + More predictable behavior when using iterators or generators. * Cons: + Not supported in older browsers (pre-ES6) and some older Node.js versions. * **Var**: Pros: + Wide support across browsers and older JavaScript versions. + Can be used with `var` declarations outside of blocks, which can lead to unexpected behavior. * Cons: + Function scope, meaning the variable is accessible throughout the entire function it's declared in. + Hoisting, where the assignment operation is moved to the top of the scope. **Library and syntax considerations:** The benchmark doesn't appear to use any external libraries. The `for` loop syntax used in both benchmarks is standard JavaScript. **Special JS feature or syntax (not present):** None mentioned in this specific benchmark. **Other alternatives:** If you wanted to compare other variable declaration approaches, such as: * **Const**: Similar to `let`, but with a more restrictive scope. * **Arrow functions**: Use the `=>` syntax instead of the traditional function declaration syntax. However, these alternatives are not present in this specific benchmark. In terms of implementation, to prepare this benchmark, you would need to: 1. Write a JavaScript script that declares two variables using both `let` and `var`. 2. Create an HTML file with a `<script>` tag referencing the JavaScript script. 3. Use MeasureThat.net's interface to create and run multiple instances of the benchmark. The resulting data will be displayed on MeasureThat.net, showing the execution speed of each variable declaration approach across different browsers and devices.
Related benchmarks:
var vs let
var vs. const vs. let
var vs const vs let
let or without let
let or without let (2)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?