Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash isEqual vs Loop and Set
(version: 0)
Compare Lodash's isEqual with a loop and a set for comparing two large, identical arrays.
Comparing performance of:
_.isEqual vs for...loop
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
function getRandomInt(max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max)); } var arrA = []; for(var i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ arrA.push({value:getRandomInt(100)}); } var arrAc = [...arrA];
Tests:
_.isEqual
_.isEqual(_.sortBy(arrA), _.sortBy(arrAc));
for...loop
var arrB = new Set([...arrA]); for (const i of arrA) { if (!arrB.has(i)) { break; } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.isEqual
for...loop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares the performance of two approaches: Lodash's `isEqual` function and a loop-based approach using a Set data structure. **Approaches Compared** 1. **Lodash's `isEqual` function**: This is a widely-used utility function from the Lodash library that compares two values for equality. 2. **Loop-based approach with Set**: This approach uses a for...loop to iterate over the first array (`arrA`) and checks if each element exists in a Set created from the second array (`arrAc`). If an element is not found, the loop breaks. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Lodash's `isEqual` function**: * Pros: Lightweight, efficient, and widely adopted. * Cons: May have performance issues for very large arrays due to its recursive nature. 2. **Loop-based approach with Set**: * Pros: Can be more efficient than the recursive `isEqual` function for large arrays, as it uses a single pass through the data. * Cons: More complex and error-prone due to the use of a Set. **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks like array manipulation, string handling, and more. The `isEqual` function is part of this library and is used here as the baseline comparison method. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** None are mentioned in the provided benchmark code. **Other Alternatives** For comparing arrays, other approaches might include: * Using a library like jQuery's `eq()` method * Utilizing the built-in JavaScript `every()` method with an arrow function * Implementing a custom comparison algorithm using bitwise operations However, these alternatives are not part of the Lodash library or Set-based approach. **Benchmark Interpretation** The benchmark results show that the loop-based approach with Set performs better than Lodash's `isEqual` function for this specific use case. This is likely due to the efficiency gains from using a single pass through the data in the Set approach, as opposed to the recursive nature of `isEqual`. To interpret these results, one can consider factors like: * The size and complexity of the input arrays * The expected frequency of use cases requiring array comparison * The trade-off between code readability and performance Keep in mind that this benchmark is specific to the provided test case and might not generalize to all scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
Unique lodash vs vanilla
Array Intersection vs. Set Intersection vs. Lodash - big
Lodash.isArray vs Array.isArray (Lodash v4.17.15)
Array.prototype.every vs Lodash every()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?