Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
null vs !
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
null vs !
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var value = { a: 123 }
Tests:
null
value == null
!
!value
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
null
!
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is created using MeasureThat.net, a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmark definition json consists of: * "Name": "null vs !" * "Description": null (not specified) * "Script Preparation Code": "var value = { a: 123 }" (sets up an object `value` with a property `a` equal to 123) The script preparation code is used to set up the environment for the benchmark. In this case, it creates an object `value` with a single property `a`. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. "Benchmark Definition": "value == null" * "Test Name": "null" 2. "Benchmark Definition": "!value" (using the logical NOT operator) * "Test Name": "!" The first test case checks if the `value` object is equal to `null`. The second test case uses the logical NOT operator (`!`) to negate the `value` object. **What's being tested** In essence, these two test cases are comparing the performance of: 1. Checking if an object is equal to `null` (using `== null`) 2. Negating an object using the logical NOT operator (`!`) **Options compared** The options being compared here are: * Using the `== null` syntax to check for nullity * Using the logical NOT operator (`!`) to negate an object **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **Using `== null`**: This is a common way to check if an object is equal to `null`. However, it can be problematic in some cases, such as when dealing with primitive types (e.g., numbers or strings) that are assigned the value of `null` using the assignment operator (`=`). In these cases, using `== null` may not behave as expected. 2. **Using logical NOT operator (`!`)**: This approach is generally safer and more idiomatic in JavaScript, as it's less prone to unexpected behavior when dealing with different types. However, it may require a bit of mental gymnastics to understand the nuances of how negating an object works. **Library: `!` (Logical Not)** The library being used here is the logical NOT operator (`!`). This operator is a built-in part of JavaScript and is used to negate a value or expression. When applied to an object, it returns the opposite boolean value (i.e., `true` becomes `false`, and vice versa). **Other considerations** * **Null coalescing**: Depending on the context, using `== null` may lead to unexpected behavior if the value being checked is not exactly `null`. Using the logical NOT operator (`!`) can help avoid these issues. * **Type coercion**: When working with objects, it's essential to be mindful of type coercion rules, which can affect how values are treated. In this case, using the logical NOT operator (`!`) avoids potential type coercion issues. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for checking nullity or negating an object in JavaScript include: * Using the `===` and `!==` operators (which also check for equality and inequality) * Using a function like `Object.is()` or `typeof` to check if an object is not equal to `null` * Using a library or utility function specifically designed for working with nullity, such as Lodash's `isNil()` function
Related benchmarks:
Return true vs return;
Nullish coalescing vs logical OR operators
dsgfhtere453egrfv
if(!variable) vs if(variable===undefined) performance
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?