Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Explicit vs Implicit convertion
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Explicit conversion vs Implicit conversion
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var n = 1; var res;
Tests:
Explicit conversion
res = String(n);
Implicit conversion
res = n + "";
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Explicit conversion
Implicit conversion
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined by two test cases: 1. **Implicit Conversion**: `res = n + ""` (note the double quotes) 2. **Explicit Conversion**: `res = String(n)` (using the built-in `String()` function) **What's being tested?** In both cases, a variable `n` is assigned the value `1`. The difference lies in how this assignment is written: * In the **Implicit Conversion** test case, the double quotes (`""`) are used, which allows the JavaScript interpreter to implicitly convert the numeric literal `1` to a string. * In the **Explicit Conversion** test case, the `String()` function is explicitly called, making it clear that the intention is to convert the number `1` to a string. **Pros and Cons** **Implicit Conversion:** Pros: * More concise and readable code * Can be faster because it avoids the overhead of a function call Cons: * May lead to unexpected behavior if the developer is not aware of the implicit conversion * Can make the code harder to debug and maintain **Explicit Conversion:** Pros: * Clearly communicates the intention of converting a value to a string * Easier to debug and maintain because there's no room for ambiguity Cons: * More verbose code * May be slower due to the overhead of the function call **Library and Special Features** There is no explicit library mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of implicit conversion can lead to issues with certain libraries or frameworks that rely on explicit string conversions. No special JavaScript features are used in this benchmark. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for explicit string conversion include using template literals (introduced in ECMAScript 2015) like `res = n + '';` or using a library function like `String(n)` (although the latter is not necessary here). It's also worth noting that some linters and code analyzers may flag implicit conversions as potential issues, so developers should be aware of these tools when writing their code. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The script preparation code includes two variables: `var n = 1;` and `var res;`. The variable `n` is initialized with the value `1`, while `res` remains uninitialized. This setup allows for a straightforward comparison between implicit and explicit conversion methods.
Related benchmarks:
Implicit vs Explicit convertion
parseInt vs Number vs implicit conversion
Implicit vs parseInt vs Number string to num
Implicit vs parseFloat vs Number string to num
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?