Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator2azezae
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its options. **Benchmark Overview** The MeasureThat.net benchmark compares the performance of two approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript: the traditional `Array.prototype.concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator (`...`). **Options Compared** 1. **Traditional `Array.prototype.concat()`**: This method creates a new array by copying elements from the original array (`params`) and the source array (`[ 1, 2 ]`). 2. **ES6 Spread Operator (`...`)**: This method uses the spread operator to create a new array by copying elements from the original array (`params`) and the source array (`[ 1, 2 ]`). **Pros and Cons** * **Traditional `Array.prototype.concat()`**: + Pros: Well-established, widely supported, and easy to understand. + Cons: Creates a new array object, which can be memory-intensive for large datasets. * **ES6 Spread Operator (`...`)**: + Pros: More efficient, as it uses a single operation instead of creating two separate arrays. It also avoids the creation of a new array object. + Cons: May not work correctly in older browsers or with certain library implementations. **Library Usage** The benchmark does not use any external libraries for its execution. **Special JavaScript Feature/Syntax** The test cases utilize the spread operator, which is a relatively recent feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES6). The spread operator allows you to expand an iterable (such as an array or string) into individual elements. **Alternative Approaches** Other approaches for concatenating arrays include: 1. **Array.prototype.push()**: Using `push()` to add elements to the end of an array. 2. **Array.prototype.slice()**: Creating a shallow copy of an array using `slice()`. 3. **Array.prototype.join()**: Concatenating arrays using the `join()` method, which is typically used with strings. However, these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs compared to the traditional `concat()` method and the spread operator.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator 12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?