Benchmark: Array spread vs push 2

Tests:

push
let arr = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { arr.push(i); }
spread
let arr = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { arr = [...arr, i]; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
push
spread

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and what are the pros and cons of each approach.

**Benchmark Definition**
The benchmark is defined by two test cases: `push` and `spread`. Both tests create an empty array `arr` and then populate it with 1000 elements using different methods.

**Push Method**
```javascript
let arr = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
  arr.push(i);
}
```
This method uses the `push()` method to append each element to the end of the array. The `push()` method modifies the original array and returns the new length.

**Spread Method**
```javascript
let arr = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
  arr = [...arr, i];
}
```
This method uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array by concatenating the existing elements of `arr` with the new element `i`. This creates a new array each time, instead of modifying the original array.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Push Method**
	+ Pros: Simple, efficient, and widely supported.
	+ Cons: Modifies the original array, which can be unexpected behavior in some cases. Also, if you need to access elements in the middle of the array, it may be slower due to the push operation at the end.
* **Spread Method**
	+ Pros: Creates a new array each time, so it doesn't modify the original array. This is often considered safer and more predictable behavior.
	+ Cons: Less efficient than the `push()` method since it creates a new array each time. Also, it may have additional overhead due to the spread operator.

**Library Usage**
There is no library explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, some modern browsers (e.g., Chrome) use V8's internal array implementation, which may influence the results. The `...` spread operator is a part of the ECMAScript standard and is supported by most modern browsers.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**
The benchmark uses a simple for loop to populate the array, but it doesn't specify any special features or syntax like ES6 classes, async/await, or promises. If you were to modify the benchmark to include these features, it would likely affect the results due to the differences in how modern browsers execute them.

**Other Alternatives**
If you wanted to create a similar benchmark, you could experiment with different array methods, such as:

* `concat()`: Similar to the spread method but creates a new array each time and modifies the original array.
* `set()`: Adds elements to an array in a specific order and is often faster than `push()` for large arrays.
* Using `Array.prototype.reduce()` or `Array.prototype.forEach()` instead of loops.

Keep in mind that the results would depend on the browser, engine, and version used, as well as any custom optimization or caching mechanisms.

Related benchmarks:

Array spread vs push 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: push vs spread

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

push

spread

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):