Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Number() vs +
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
+ vs Number()
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
+
console.log(+'1000');
Number()
console.log(Number('1000'));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
+
Number()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. The website, MeasureThat.net, is comparing two different ways to convert a string value to a number: using the unary plus operator (`+`) and the `Number()` function. **Options Being Compared** 1. **Unary Plus Operator (`+`)**: This approach converts the string to a number by adding it as if it were a literal number. 2. **Number() Function**: This built-in JavaScript function converts a string to a number. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Unary Plus Operator (`+`)** + Pros: - Faster execution, since it's just a simple arithmetic operation. - More intuitive for some developers who might not be familiar with the `Number()` function. + Cons: - Can lead to unexpected behavior if the string is not a valid number (e.g., "abc"). * **Number() Function** + Pros: - Safer, since it will return NaN (Not a Number) for invalid input strings. - More explicit and clear in its intent. + Cons: - Slightly slower execution compared to the unary plus operator. **Library Used** In this benchmark, no specific library is used beyond the built-in `Number()` function. However, it's worth noting that some libraries (e.g., jQuery) may also provide a similar conversion method using `$()` or `parseInt()`. In this case, we're focused on the browser's built-in implementation. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmark definitions. They only involve basic arithmetic operations and string manipulation. **Other Alternatives** If you need to convert a string to a number, there are other alternatives: 1. **parseInt() Function**: This function can be used with an optional second argument to specify the radix (base) of the input string. 2. ** parseFloat() Function**: Similar to `parseInt()`, but allows for decimal numbers and doesn't require an explicit radix argument. In summary, MeasureThat.net is testing two common ways to convert a string to a number in JavaScript: using the unary plus operator (`+`) versus the built-in `Number()` function. The results will help developers understand which approach is faster and more reliable for their specific use cases.
Related benchmarks:
+string vs Number vs parseInt
Number constructor vs unary plus vs parseInt
Number vs + vs parseFloat + properties px
parseInt vs Number addition Fork
parseInt vs Number BigInts
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?