Benchmark: Modulo Alternatives

Script Preparation code:

function modulo(dividend, divisor){
	while (dividend >= divisor){
		dividend -= divisor;
	}
	return dividend;
}

Tests:

Standard Modulo
var remainder = 400 % 360;
Alternate Modulo #1
var remainder = modulo(400, 360);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Standard Modulo
Alternate Modulo #1

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 142 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Standard Modulo	142630496.0 Ops/sec
Alternate Modulo #1	109877160.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is tested in the benchmark:**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that tests two approaches to calculating the modulo of two numbers.

**Options compared:**

There are two options being compared:

1. **Standard Modulo**: This approach uses the standard `%` operator, which performs integer division and returns the remainder.
2. **Alternate Modulo #1**: This approach is a custom implementation of the modulo operation, using a while loop to repeatedly subtract the divisor from the dividend until the result is less than the divisor.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **Standard Modulo**:
	+ Pros: Simple and efficient implementation, widely supported by browsers and JavaScript engines.
	+ Cons: May not be suitable for very large numbers or specialized use cases where performance optimization is critical.
* **Alternate Modulo #1**:
	+ Pros: Can be optimized for performance, potentially faster than the standard modulo operator in certain situations.
	+ Cons: Custom implementation may not be as widely supported by browsers and JavaScript engines, and may require additional code maintenance.

**Library usage:**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or individual test cases. However, it's worth noting that some implementations of the `%` operator rely on a mathematical formula to compute the remainder, which involves using a constant value (e.g., `-0x100000001`). This value is likely defined by the JavaScript engine, but its purpose is not explicitly stated in this benchmark.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes mentioned in this benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript syntax and does not include any experimental or emerging features.

**Other alternatives:**

Some alternative approaches to calculating the modulo operation might include:

* Using a library like [BigInt.js](https://github.com/MikeMcQuaid/Big-JS) for arbitrary-precision arithmetic.
* Implementing a custom polynomial long division algorithm for efficient modular exponentiation.
* Using SIMD instructions (e.g., SSE, AVX) to accelerate the modulo operation on certain platforms.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as widely supported or optimized as the standard `%` operator, and their performance characteristics may vary depending on the specific use case.

Related benchmarks:

Modulo Alternatives (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Standard Modulo vs Alternate Modulo #1

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Standard Modulo

Alternate Modulo #1

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):