Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
concat vs spread compare
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [].concat([ 1, 2 ], params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its results. **Benchmark Purpose** The benchmark compares two ways of concatenating arrays in JavaScript: using the `concat()` method and using the spread operator (`...`). The goal is to determine which approach is faster. **Options Compared** The benchmark measures the performance of two options: 1. **`Array.prototype.concat()`**: This method takes an array as an argument and returns a new array that contains all elements from the original array, plus the elements passed to it. 2. **Spread operator (`...`)**: This syntax creates a new array by copying all elements from the specified iterable (in this case, `params`). **Pros and Cons** * **`Array.prototype.concat()`**: + Pros: widely supported, easy to understand, and reliable. + Cons: it creates a new array object every time it's called, which can be memory-intensive for large arrays. Additionally, it may perform slower than the spread operator due to its overhead. * **Spread operator (`...`)**: + Pros: more concise, efficient, and modern syntax that's widely adopted in JavaScript. + Cons: not supported in older browsers or environments (e.g., Internet Explorer), and may cause issues with certain array methods or libraries. **Library Used** The benchmark doesn't explicitly mention any libraries, but it does use the `Array.prototype.concat()` method, which is a built-in JavaScript method. However, if you're using a library that provides an alternative implementation of this method (e.g., Lodash's `concat` function), it may affect the results. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The benchmark doesn't mention any special JavaScript features or syntaxes beyond the use of the spread operator. However, it's worth noting that modern JavaScript environments often support other advanced features like arrow functions, destructuring, and async/await, which are not used in this benchmark. **Other Considerations** When running this benchmark on your own machine, keep in mind: * The benchmark's results may vary depending on the specific environment, hardware, and version of JavaScript you're using. * To get accurate results, make sure to run multiple executions and check for variations between runs. * You can also experiment with modifying the input data (e.g., adding more elements) or tweaking other factors like array size and iteration order to see how they affect performance. **Alternatives** If you want to explore alternative approaches to this benchmark, consider trying: * **Using a library**: Utilize libraries like Lodash or Ramda that provide optimized implementations of the `concat` method. * **Native implementation**: Use the `concat` method directly on an array object (i.e., `[]`) to compare performance with the built-in JavaScript implementation. * **Looping through elements**: Instead of using concatenation, loop through each element in the array and push it onto a new array. This approach might provide insight into the underlying mechanics of the benchmark. * **Using other concatenation methods**: Experiment with other approaches like `Array.from()` or `Array.push()` to see if they offer better performance. Remember that the best approach will depend on your specific use case, environment, and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.concat vs Spread Operator
spread vs concat vs unshift to join arrays
concat vs spread three arrays
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?