Benchmark: Ramda values vs Object.values 0.27

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.0/ramda.min.js"></script>

Tests:

Ramda values
const data = { key: "abc" } R.values(data);
Object.values()
const data = { key: "abc" } Object.values(data);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ramda values
Object.values()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance difference between using Ramda's `R.values` function and the native `Object.values` method in JavaScript, on a sample dataset containing a single object with a key-value pair. The benchmark runs two tests:

1. "Ramda values"
2. "Object.values()"

**Options Compared**

The options being compared are:

* Ramda's `R.values` function
* Native `Object.values` method

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

**Ramda's R.values Function:**

Pros:

* Provides a consistent, predictable interface for accessing object values.
* Can be more concise than using `Object.keys()` and indexing into the resulting array.

Cons:

* Requires an external library (Ramda) to be included in the project.
* May have overhead due to the extra function call and potential compilation time.

**Native Object.values Method:**

Pros:

* Built-in, no additional libraries are required.
* Typically faster since it's a native method with optimized performance.

Cons:

* May not provide as much control or predictability over the resulting array as Ramda's `R.values` function.

**Other Considerations**

Both approaches have their trade-offs. If you need more control over the iteration process, Ramda's `R.values` might be a better choice. However, if speed and simplicity are priority, using `Object.values()` is likely a better option.

**Library and Purpose (Ramda)**

The library being used here is Ramda, which provides functional programming utilities for JavaScript. In this specific case, the `R.values` function allows you to extract values from an object in a concise way. Ramda is often used for tasks like data transformation, filtering, and manipulation.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax (None)**

This benchmark doesn't use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require explanation beyond what's covered above.

**Benchmark Preparation Code**

The provided script preparation code includes an external library (Ramda) to be included in the project. This ensures that Ramda's `R.values` function is available for testing.

**Other Alternatives**

If you want to compare the performance of other libraries or alternatives, such as Lodash or Vanilla JavaScript implementations, you can modify the benchmark script preparation code to include those libraries instead.

For example, if using Lodash:

```html
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash/4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
```

And update the "Html Preparation Code" accordingly:

```html
"<script src=\"https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.0/ramda.min.js\"></script>
<script src=\"https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash/4.17.21/lodash.min.js\"></script>"
```

Keep in mind that you'll need to update the `Benchmark Definition` json accordingly, specifying which library or implementation is being tested.

By running these benchmarks, developers can get a better understanding of the performance implications of using different libraries and approaches for accessing object values in JavaScript.

Related benchmarks:

Ramda values vs Object.values 0.27 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Ramda values vs Object.values()

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Ramda values

Object.values()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):