Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Create DOM nodes 3
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Fragment vs Template 1 vs Template 2 vs Parser
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Fragment
const html = ` <div> <ul> <li id="component">Hello</li> </ul> </div> ` const fragment = document .createRange() .createContextualFragment(html) .getElementById('component') console.log(fragment)
Template 1
const html = ` <div> <ul> <li id="component">Hello</li> </ul> </div> ` const template = document.createElement('template') template.innerHTML = html const template1 = Array(3).fill().reduce((template, current) => template.firstElementChild, template.content) console.log(template1)
Template 2
const html = ` <div> <ul> <li id="component">Hello</li> </ul> </div> ` const template = document.createElement('template') template.innerHTML = html const template2 = template.content.getElementById('component') console.log(template2)
Parser
const html = ` <div> <ul> <li id="component">Hello</li> </ul> </div> ` const parser = new DOMParser().parseFromString(html, 'text/html').getElementById('component') console.log(parser)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Fragment
Template 1
Template 2
Parser
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **What is being tested?** The test cases are designed to measure the performance of different approaches for creating and manipulating DOM nodes in JavaScript. Specifically, they compare: 1. Creating a DOM fragment from an HTML string 2. Using a template element to create multiple DOM elements 3. Parsing an HTML string using the `DOMParser` API **Options compared** The test cases use the following options to achieve these goals: * **Template element**: A `template` element is created and its `innerHTML` property is set to an HTML string. The `template.content` property is then used to create multiple DOM elements. * **Fragment**: A `document.createRange()` object is created, and then a `createContextualFragment()` method is called on it with the HTML string as an argument. The resulting fragment's `getElementById()` method is used to retrieve the desired element. * **Parser**: The `DOMParser` API is used to parse the HTML string into a Document object. The resulting Document object's `getElementById()` method is then used to retrieve the desired element. **Pros and Cons of each approach** 1. **Template element**: * Pros: Can be more efficient than creating multiple DOM elements using fragment or parser. * Cons: May require additional setup and may not work in all cases (e.g., if the template element is not properly set up). 2. **Fragment**: * Pros: Allows for dynamic creation of DOM fragments, which can be useful in certain scenarios. * Cons: Can be slower than using a template element or parser, especially for large HTML strings. 3. **Parser**: * Pros: Fast and efficient way to parse HTML strings into Document objects. * Cons: May require additional memory allocation and may not work in all cases (e.g., if the parsed document is not properly set up). **Other considerations** * The test cases assume that the input HTML string has a specific structure, which may not be representative of real-world scenarios. * The test cases do not account for errors or edge cases that may occur during execution. * The `ExecutionsPerSecond` metric used to measure performance may not accurately reflect real-world usage patterns. **Libraries and APIs** The test cases use the following libraries and APIs: * **DOMParser**: A built-in API in JavaScript that allows parsing HTML strings into Document objects. * **document.createRange()**: A method provided by the DOM API that creates a range object, which can be used to create fragments. **Special JS features or syntax** The test cases do not use any special JavaScript features or syntax. However, they do rely on the `DOM` and `Template` APIs, which are part of the standard JavaScript API. **Alternatives** Other approaches that could be used for creating and manipulating DOM nodes include: * **DocumentFragment**: A built-in object in JavaScript that allows creating fragments. * **innerHTML/outerHTML**: Methods provided by HTML elements that allow setting the inner or outer HTML content. * **DOM manipulation libraries**: Libraries like jQuery or React that provide APIs for manipulating DOM nodes. These alternatives may offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, flexibility, and ease of use.
Related benchmarks:
createElement vs cloneNode (no children)
createElement vs cloneNode with content
Loop through child nodes multiple times - v2
createElement vs cloneNode ㅠ53152 3241412 v
Node closest vs node contains forkedd
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?