Benchmark: klona vs Lodash cloneDeep

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/klona@2.0.4/json/index.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var sampleObject = [{
        "id": "0001",
        "type": "donut",
        "name": "Cake",
        "ppu": 0.55,
        "batters": {
            "batter": [{
                    "id": "1001",
                    "type": "Regular"
                },
                {
                    "id": "1002",
                    "type": "Chocolate"
                },
                {
                    "id": "1003",
                    "type": "Blueberry"
                },
                {
                    "id": "1004",
                    "type": "Devil's Food"
                }
            ]
        },
        "topping": [{
                "id": "5001",
                "type": "None"
            },
            {
                "id": "5002",
                "type": "Glazed"
            },
            {
                "id": "5005",
                "type": "Sugar"
            },
            {
                "id": "5007",
                "type": "Powdered Sugar"
            },
            {
                "id": "5006",
                "type": "Chocolate with Sprinkles"
            },
            {
                "id": "5003",
                "type": "Chocolate"
            },
            {
                "id": "5004",
                "type": "Maple"
            }
        ]
    },
    {
        "id": "0002",
        "type": "donut",
        "name": "Raised",
        "ppu": 0.55,
        "batters": {
            "batter": [{
                "id": "1001",
                "type": "Regular"
            }]
        },
        "topping": [{
                "id": "5001",
                "type": "None"
            },
            {
                "id": "5002",
                "type": "Glazed"
            },
            {
                "id": "5005",
                "type": "Sugar"
            },
            {
                "id": "5003",
                "type": "Chocolate"
            },
            {
                "id": "5004",
                "type": "Maple"
            }
        ]
    },
    {
        "id": "0003",
        "type": "donut",
        "name": "Old Fashioned",
        "ppu": 0.55,
        "batters": {
            "batter": [{
                    "id": "1001",
                    "type": "Regular"
                },
                {
                    "id": "1002",
                    "type": "Chocolate"
                }
            ]
        },
        "topping": [{
                "id": "5001",
                "type": "None"
            },
            {
                "id": "5002",
                "type": "Glazed"
            },
            {
                "id": "5003",
                "type": "Chocolate"
            },
            {
                "id": "5004",
                "type": "Maple"
            }
        ]
    }
];

var myCopy = null;

Tests:

Lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(sampleObject);
Klona
myCopy = klona(sampleObject);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash cloneDeep
Klona

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:136.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/136.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 136 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Klona

208K/s

Lodash cloneDeep

41K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Klona	207,751 Ops/sec
Lodash cloneDeep	41,464 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three cloning functions:

1. `cloneDeep` from Lodash
2. `copy` from React Fiber Data Structure Control (RFDC)
3. `klona`

These functions are responsible for creating a deep copy of an object.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code defines a sample object `sampleObject`, which is used as the input for the cloning functions.
```javascript
var sampleObject = [{...}];
```
This object has nested objects and arrays, making it suitable for testing cloning functionality.

**Html Preparation Code**

The html preparation code includes two external JavaScript files:

1. Lodash: `https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js`
2. Klona: `https://unpkg.com/klona@2.0.4/json/index.js`

These libraries provide the cloning functions to be tested.

**Individual Test Cases**

The benchmark includes two test cases:

1. **Lodash cloneDeep**: Clones the sample object using Lodash's `cloneDeep` function.
```javascript
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(sampleObject);
```
2. **Klona**: Clones the sample object using Klona's `copy` function.
```javascript
myCopy = klona(sampleObject);
```
**What are the pros and cons of each approach?**

1. **Lodash cloneDeep**
	* Pros:
		+ Well-tested and widely used library
		+ Supports deep cloning with options for customizing behavior
	* Cons:
		+ Larger binary size due to Lodash's overhead
		+ May not be as optimized for performance as other libraries
2. **Klona**
	* Pros:
		+ Smaller binary size compared to Lodash
		+ Optimized for performance, using a custom implementation
	* Cons:
		+ Less well-known and tested library
		+ May require more setup or configuration
3. **RFDC copy**
	* Pros:
		+ Optimized for React Fiber's specific use case
		+ Small binary size due to React Fiber's compact implementation
	* Cons:
		+ Limited use case compared to Lodash and Klona
		+ May not be suitable for general-purpose deep cloning

**Library analysis**

1. **Lodash**
	* Purpose: A comprehensive utility library providing various functions, including `cloneDeep`.
	* Used by many popular projects and applications.
2. **Klona**
	* Purpose: A lightweight library specifically designed for creating deep copies of objects.
	* Optimized for performance, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments.

**Benchmark results**

The latest benchmark result shows that Klona outperforms Lodash in terms of execution speed (`ExecutionsPerSecond`). However, the actual performance difference may vary depending on the specific use case and environment.

klona vs Lodash cloneDeep (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: Lodash cloneDeep vs Json clone vs RFDC copy vs klona copy

Comparing performance of: `Lodash cloneDeep vs Klona`

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash cloneDeep

Klona

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

klona vs Lodash cloneDeep (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: Lodash cloneDeep vs Json clone vs RFDC copy vs klona copy

Comparing performance of: Lodash cloneDeep vs Klona

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash cloneDeep

Klona

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Lodash cloneDeep vs Klona`