Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
|| vs &&
(version: 0)
OR(||) vs AND(&&) performance benchmarking with short-circuit
Comparing performance of:
OR(||) vs AND(&&)
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
OR(||)
true || true || true || true || true
AND(&&)
true && true && true && true && true
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
OR(||)
AND(&&)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two benchmark test cases: 1. `|| vs &&`: This test compares the performance of short-circuit evaluation in OR (`||`) and AND (`&&`) logical operators. 2. Individual test cases: * `true || true || true || true || true` (OR with multiple operands) * `true && true && true && true && true` (AND with multiple operands) **Options compared:** In the context of JavaScript, OR (`||`) and AND (`&&`) logical operators are implemented using a short-circuit evaluation mechanism. This means that the expression is evaluated from left to right, and as soon as the first "falsey" value is encountered, the rest of the expression is not evaluated. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **Short-circuit evaluation**: This approach reduces unnecessary computations by immediately stopping the evaluation when a falsey value is encountered. However, it also means that some expressions might be executed in an unexpected order. 2. **Optimized implementations**: Modern JavaScript engines, like V8 (used in Chrome), have optimized the implementation of these operators to minimize overhead and maximize performance. **Library usage:** None mentioned in the provided JSON. **Special JS features or syntax:** There's no special feature or syntax mentioned, as this is a straightforward benchmarking test focusing on logical operator performance. **Other alternatives:** If you were to implement this benchmark yourself, you could use various approaches: 1. **Manual loop**: Create a manual loop that repeatedly evaluates the expressions and measures their execution time. 2. **Benchmarking libraries**: Utilize popular benchmarking libraries like Benchmark.js or js-benchmark, which provide an easy-to-use API for running microbenchmarks. 3. **V8's `fast-deps` test suite**: If you're familiar with V8's source code, you could use the `fast-deps` test suite to create a custom benchmark that targets specific JavaScript operators. Keep in mind that MeasureThat.net's implementation is likely optimized for performance and accuracy, making it an excellent reference point for similar benchmarks.
Related benchmarks:
Which operator (== vs >) is faster?
Which cmp operator (== vs === vs >) is faster?
Which comparison operator (> vs ===) is faster?
Which comparison operator (> vs === vs !truthy) is faster?
Hex convertion : Mapping vs Range
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?