Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster? (string)
(version: 0)
Is there a performance benefit to replacing == with ===?
Comparing performance of:
test equality vs test strict equality
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
test equality
var n = 0, text="Hello"; while(true) { n++; if (text == "World") break; if(n==100000) break; }
test strict equality
var n = 0, text="Hello"; while(true) { n++; if (text === "World") break; if(n===100000) break; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
test equality
test strict equality
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its results. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two types of equality operators in JavaScript: `==` (loose equality) and `===` (strict equality). **Options compared:** 1. Loose Equality (`==`): This operator checks for value equality, not type equality. It can lead to unexpected behavior if the operands are of different data types. 2. Strict Equality (`===`): This operator checks both value and type equality. **Pros and Cons:** * Loose Equality (`==`): + Pros: - Can be more forgiving when working with legacy code or third-party libraries that use `==`. + Cons: - Can lead to unexpected behavior if the operands are of different data types. - May not perform as well due to type coercion. * Strict Equality (`===`): + Pros: - Provides better protection against type-related errors. - Typically performs faster due to fewer type checks. **Other considerations:** In modern JavaScript, it's generally recommended to use `strict equality` (`===`) over loose equality (`==`). This is because `===` provides more accurate results and helps prevent common pitfalls like null pointer exceptions or unexpected behavior when comparing values of different data types. **Library and purpose:** There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition. The benchmark uses built-in JavaScript operators. **Special JS feature or syntax:** None are explicitly used in this benchmark, but it's worth noting that `==` and `===` are standard JavaScript operators that have been around since the language's inception. **Alternatives:** For those interested in exploring alternative approaches to equality checks, some alternatives include: * Using a library like Lodash or Jest to provide more robust equality checks * Implementing custom equality functions using techniques like reference checking or shallow equality checks * Using type-safe languages like TypeScript or Flow that can help catch type-related errors at compile-time In the context of this benchmark, however, the focus is on comparing the performance difference between `==` and `===`.
Related benchmarks:
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster?
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster?
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster?
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster2?
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster (string vs int)?
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?