Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Push vs Next index
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Push vs Next index
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Push
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; params.push('new');
Next index
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; params[params.length] = 'new';
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Push
Next index
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand the benchmark being tested. The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares two approaches for adding elements to an array: using the `push` method and using the indexing syntax (`params[params.length] = 'new';`). **What is being tested?** The benchmark tests how fast each approach performs in terms of the number of executions per second. **Options compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **Push**: The traditional way to add elements to an array using the `push` method. 2. **Next index**: A more modern and efficient approach that uses indexing syntax to add elements to the end of an array (`params[params.length] = 'new';`). **Pros and Cons** * **Push**: + Pros: Widely supported and easy to understand for most developers. + Cons: Can be slower than the indexing approach, especially for large arrays, due to the overhead of pushing a new element onto the array's length property. * **Next index**: + Pros: Often faster than the `push` method because it avoids the overhead of updating the array's length property. This can result in better performance, especially for large arrays. + Cons: May be less familiar to some developers, and its syntax may not be as intuitive. **Library usage** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. **Special JavaScript feature/syntax** None are explicitly mentioned in this particular benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the indexing approach (`params[params.length] = 'new';`) uses a common pattern in JavaScript called "array indexing" which allows direct access to array elements by their index. **Other alternatives** If you were to extend or modify this benchmark, other approaches you might consider include: * Using `unshift` instead of `push` * Adding elements to an array using the `splice` method * Comparing the performance of different data structures, such as arrays versus linked lists To prepare a new benchmark definition, you would need to create a JSON object with the following properties: * `Name`: A descriptive name for your benchmark. * `Description`: An optional description of your benchmark. * `Script Preparation Code`: Any JavaScript code needed to set up the test environment and data structures. * `Html Preparation Code`: Any HTML code needed to render the benchmark results. For example: ```json { "Name": "Array concatenation", "Description": "Compare the performance of array concatenation methods.", "Script Preparation Code": "...", "Html Preparation Code": "..." } ``` You would then define multiple test cases within a `testCases` array, each with its own `benchmarkDefinition` and `testName`.
Related benchmarks:
Spread operator vs Array.push vs array[lastIndex]
Array construct vs array push
Pushing items via Array.push vs. Spread Operator
Array Push vs. Index Access
spread vs push large
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?