Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
split vs matchsplit
(version: 0)
split vs matchsplit
Comparing performance of:
split vs matchsplit
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
split
var val = "7678"; var n =val.split('');
matchsplit
var value="*** 1234"; var m = value.match(/\d+/g)[0].split('')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
split
matchsplit
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark definition, test cases, and latest results to help explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark definition provides information about the benchmark name, description, script preparation code, and HTML preparation code (which is empty in this case). The description mentions that it compares the performance of `split()` and `match()` functions. However, there seems to be a typo or misunderstanding, as `match()` doesn't return an array of strings like `split()`. We'll assume it's meant to compare `split()` with itself or another similar function. **Test Cases:** There are two individual test cases: 1. **"split"`**: The benchmark definition for this test case is a simple JavaScript statement that uses the `split()` function on a string variable named `val`. 2. **"matchsplit"`**: This test case seems to be a combination of two functions: `match()` (which extracts a regular expression pattern from a string) and `split()`. The `match()` function is used to extract a substring (`\\d+`) from the original string, and then the resulting string is passed to the `split()` function. **Library Usage:** The `match()` function in JavaScript uses regular expressions. In this case, the regular expression pattern `\\d+` matches one or more digits. The purpose of using this pattern is likely to extract a numeric value from the original string. **Other Considerations:** * The test cases seem to be designed to measure the performance of these functions on specific input strings. * The benchmark definition doesn't specify the number of iterations, execution counts, or any other parameters that might affect the results. * The `ExecutionsPerSecond` metric is used to report the performance of each test case. This value represents the average number of executions per second for a given test case. **Alternatives:** Other alternatives to benchmark JavaScript functions like `split()` and `match()` could include: * Using built-in string methods, such as `str.split()` or `str.match()` * Implementing custom string splitting algorithms * Comparing performance with other programming languages or frameworks * Measuring memory allocation, garbage collection, or other system overheads **Other Features or Syntax:** Since the benchmark doesn't explicitly mention any special JavaScript features or syntax, we can assume that it's focused on measuring the raw performance of these two functions. However, if you were to modify the benchmark definition to include additional features or syntax, some examples might include: * Using arrow functions (`=>`) for function definitions * Leveraging modern JavaScript features like `let` and `const` * Implementing async/await or promise-based code Keep in mind that these alternatives would likely require modifications to the benchmark script and test cases to accommodate the changes. I hope this explanation helps! If you have any further questions, feel free to ask.
Related benchmarks:
String.Split and String.Match
str.match vs str.split.pop
Regex vs Split Time
string.split(RegExp); vs string.split(string);
JavaScript string split vs match using regex
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?