Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
JQuery version speed test 2021
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
$jq210 vs $jq224 vs $jq331 vs $jq351 vs $jq360
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.0/jquery.min.js'></script> <script> var $jq210 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"></script> <script> var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <script> var $jq331 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.5.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <script> var $jq351 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js"></script> <script> var $jq360 = $.noConflict(true); </script> <div> <ul id="menu"> <li class="menu-item">1</li> <li class="menu-item">2</li> <li class="menu-item">3</li> <li class="menu-item">4</li> </ul> </div>
Script Preparation code:
function tests($) { $(".menu-item").eq(2).closest("ul").css({ "background-color": "red" }).parent().css({ "border": "1px solid blue" }).hide().append($("<p></p>").text("Text.").css({ "background-color": "green" })).show().end().end().remove(); $('.menu-item').each(function(index, elem){ $(elem).addClass('c').on('click', function(e){ $(e.target).removeClass('t').data('e'); }); }); console.log('tests' + $); }
Tests:
$jq210
tests($jq210);
$jq224
tests($jq224);
$jq331
tests($jq331);
$jq351
tests($jq351);
$jq360
tests($jq360);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
$jq210
$jq224
$jq331
$jq351
$jq360
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition, script preparation code, and test cases to explain what's being tested and the pros/cons of different approaches. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of various versions of jQuery (a JavaScript library) in a specific scenario. The scenario involves creating and manipulating a HTML menu item, which includes: 1. Changing the background color of an element 2. Hiding and showing an element 3. Adding an event listener to an element **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is a self-invoking function that sets up the environment for the benchmark. It does the following: 1. Assigns jQuery versions (from 2.1.0 to 3.6.0) to variables using the `$.noConflict()` method. 2. Creates a sample HTML structure with a menu item. **Test Cases** The test cases are individual benchmarks that measure the performance of each assigned jQuery version. Each test case has two parts: 1. A "Benchmark Definition" string that invokes the `tests()` function, passing the corresponding jQuery variable as an argument. 2. A "Test Name" string that corresponds to the assigned jQuery version. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of different jQuery versions in terms of: * Speed: Measured by the number of executions per second (ExecutionsPerSecond) on a desktop browser with Chrome 94, running on Linux. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** 1. **Using multiple jQuery versions**: This approach allows for a comprehensive comparison of performance across different versions. However, it may introduce unnecessary overhead due to the need to load and initialize multiple libraries. 2. **Using a single library version**: This approach would simplify the benchmarking process but might not accurately represent real-world scenarios where developers often use multiple library versions. **Library: jQuery** jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation, event handling, and Ajax interactions. Its primary purpose is to provide an easier way to interact with web pages by providing a simpler API for common tasks. In the benchmark, jQuery is used to manipulate the sample HTML structure, adding and removing classes, and attaching event listeners. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The benchmark uses JavaScript's `noConflict()` method, which allows jQuery to coexist with other libraries that use the `$` symbol. This is useful when multiple libraries are being used together. Overall, the benchmark provides a valuable insight into the performance characteristics of different jQuery versions in a specific scenario, helping developers and maintainers make informed decisions about library upgrades or compatibility considerations.
Related benchmarks:
JQuery version speed test
JQuery version speed test - PT
JQuery version speed test / new
JQuery version speed test with 3.6.0
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?