Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash takeRight vs slice
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
_.takeRight vs array.prototype.slice
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
function getRandomInt(max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max)); } var arr = []; for(var i = 0; i < 100000; i++){ arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)}); }
Tests:
_.takeRight
_.takeRight(arr, 3);
array.prototype.slice
arr.slice(arr, -3);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.takeRight
array.prototype.slice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
_.takeRight
7160898.5 Ops/sec
array.prototype.slice
444.9 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for taking the last 3 elements from an array: 1. **Lodash `takeRight`**: A function that takes an array and a number as arguments, returning a new array containing the elements from the end up to but not including the specified length. 2. **Array.prototype.slice** (using negative indexing): A method that creates a shallow copy of a portion of an array, with a start index of 0, an end index equal to the current length, and an optional step value. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code generates a large array (`arr`) containing 100,000 objects with random integer values between 0 and 100. This array serves as the input for both benchmarked functions. **Html Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code includes a reference to Lodash version 4.17.21, which is used by the `takeRight` function. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Lodash `takeRight`**: Measures the execution time of the `_.takeRight(arr, 3)` function. 2. **Array.prototype.slice**: Measures the execution time of the `arr.slice(arr, -3)` expression (using negative indexing). **Comparison** The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches: 1. **Lodash `takeRight`**: Pros: * Simplified and optimized implementation * Uses a library that provides additional utility functions * May be faster due to its internal optimizations 2. **Array.prototype.slice**: Pros: * Native JavaScript implementation, potentially more efficient * Doesn't rely on an external library * Can be optimized by the browser's JIT compiler **Cons** 1. **Lodash `takeRight`**: * Requires including the Lodash library, which adds overhead * May have additional dependencies or conflicts 2. **Array.prototype.slice**: * May not be as efficient due to the need for manual indexing and length calculations * Can lead to slower performance on large arrays **Library: Lodash** Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions, including `takeRight`. It's designed to simplify common tasks and provide a consistent interface across different programming languages. The use of Lodash in this benchmark allows developers to easily switch between approaches without having to implement the logic themselves. **Special JS Feature: Arrow Functions** The script preparation code uses arrow functions (`() => { ... }`) to create the random integer generator function. This feature was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and provides a concise syntax for defining small, one-time use functions. Other alternatives to these approaches: * **Using `Array.prototype.slice` with positive indexing**: Instead of using negative indexing, you can use `arr.slice(0, arr.length - 3)` to achieve the same result. * **Implementing custom `takeRight` function**: You could write your own implementation of `takeRight` using native JavaScript functions and loops. In conclusion, this benchmark provides a useful comparison between two approaches for taking the last few elements from an array: Lodash's optimized `takeRight` function versus the native `Array.prototype.slice` method with negative indexing. The results will help developers understand the performance implications of each approach in their own codebase.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash max vs Math.max (lodash 4.7.11)
Lodash sort vs array.prototype.sort with slice
Lodash takeRight vs slice correct
Lodash max vs JS Math.max (2022)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?