Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object Deep Copy test
(version: 0)
Produce a deep copy of a Javascript object where nested objects are not simply references to the originals.
Comparing performance of:
Recursive Deep Copy vs JSON Deep Copy vs lodash clone
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.js"></script> <script src="https://unpkg.com/babel-standalone@6/babel.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
function recursiveDeepCopy(obj) { return Object.keys(obj).reduce((v, d) => Object.assign(v, { [d]: (obj[d].constructor === Object) ? recursiveDeepCopy(obj[d]) : obj[d] }), {}); } function jsonDeepCopy(o) { return JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o)); } var dimensions = [{ "dimensions": [{ "runtime": { "common": { "client": null, "server": null } } }, { "device": { "android": null, "blackberry": null, "iemobile": null, "iphone": null, "ipad": null, "kindle": null, "opera-mini": null, "palm": null } }, { "environment": { "development": { "dev": null, "test": null }, "production": { "stage": null, "prod": null } } }, { "lang": { "ar": { "ar-JO": null, "ar-MA": null, "ar-SA": null, "ar-EG": null }, "bn": { "bn-IN": null }, "ca": { "ca-ES": null }, "cs": { "cs-CZ": null }, "da": { "da-DK": null }, "de": { "de-AT": null, "de-DE": null }, "el": { "el-GR": null }, "en": { "en-AU": null, "en-BG": null, "en-CA": null, "en-GB": null, "en-GY": null, "en-HK": null, "en-IE": null, "en-IN": null, "en-MY": null, "en-NZ": null, "en-PH": null, "en-SG": null, "en-US": null, "en-ZA": null }, "es": { "es-AR": null, "es-BO": null, "es-CL": null, "es-CO": null, "es-EC": null, "es-ES": null, "es-MX": null, "es-PE": null, "es-PY": null, "es-US": null, "es-UY": null, "es-VE": null }, "fi": { "fi-FI": null }, "fr": { "fr-BE": null, "fr-CA": null, "fr-FR": null, "fr-GF": null }, "hi": { "hi-IN": null }, "hu": { "hu-HU": null }, "id": { "id-ID": null }, "it": { "it-IT": null }, "ja": { "ja-JP": null }, "kn": { "kn-IN": null }, "ko": { "ko-KR": null }, "ml": { "ml-IN": null }, "mr": { "mr-IN": null }, "ms": { "ms-MY": null }, "nb": { "nb-NO": null }, "nl": { "nl-BE": null, "nl-NL": null, "nl-SR": null }, "pl": { "pl-PL": null }, "pt": { "pt-BR": null }, "ro": { "ro-RO": null }, "ru": { "ru-RU": null }, "sv": { "sv-SE": null }, "ta": { "ta-IN": null }, "te": { "te-IN": null }, "th": { "th-TH": null }, "tr": { "tr-TR": null }, "vi": { "vi-VN": null }, "zh": { "zh-Hans": { "zh-Hans-CN": null }, "zh-Hant": { "zh-Hant-HK": null, "zh-Hant-TW": null } } } }] }]
Tests:
Recursive Deep Copy
var dimensionsCopy = recursiveDeepCopy(dimensions);
JSON Deep Copy
var dimensionsCopy = jsonDeepCopy(dimensions);
lodash clone
var dimensionsCopy = _.cloneDeep(dimensions);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Recursive Deep Copy
JSON Deep Copy
lodash clone
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
The test results show that: 1. The recursive deep copy function has the fastest execution time, with an average of **2334438.5 executions per second** on a Firefox 118 browser on a Linux desktop. 2. The JSON deep copy function is slower, averaging around **74547.5859375 executions per second**. 3. The lodash clone function is the slowest, averaging about **30299.357421875 executions per second**. These results suggest that the recursive deep copy function is the most efficient among the three options. However, without more context or information about the specific requirements and constraints of the project, it's difficult to make a definitive conclusion. Here are some potential conclusions based on these results: * If speed is the primary concern, the recursive deep copy function may be the best choice. * If code readability and maintainability are prioritized, the JSON deep copy function might be a better option. * If ease of use and flexibility are key, the lodash clone function could still be a viable solution. Further analysis or additional data would be necessary to make a more informed decision.
Related benchmarks:
Object Deep Copy
Object Deep Copy e
Object Deep Copy 2
Object Deep Copy vs structuredClone
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?