Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Testing 1231231: Concat vs Spread
(version: 0)
This tests concat vs spreading two arrays into one.
Comparing performance of:
Concat vs Spread
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Concat
const a = new Array(1000).fill(Math.random()); const b = new Array(1000).fill(Math.random()); const c = a.concat(b);
Spread
const a = new Array(1000).fill(Math.random()); const b = new Array(1000).fill(Math.random()); const c= [...a, ...b]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Concat
Spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data to understand what is being tested and the options being compared. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents a single test case. In this case, there are two test cases: "Concat" and "Spread". The main difference between these two test cases is how they concatenate (join) two arrays into one. **Options Being Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **`concat()` method**: This is the traditional way of concatenating arrays in JavaScript. 2. **Spread operator (`...`)**: This is a newer way of concatenating arrays, introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: **Concat() Method:** Pros: * Widely supported across browsers * Often considered more readable and intuitive Cons: * Can be slower than the spread operator due to its implementation details **Spread Operator (`...`):** Pros: * Faster execution time compared to `concat()` method * Can be more efficient when dealing with large arrays Cons: * Requires support for ES6, which may not be available in older browsers or environments * Can be less readable for developers unfamiliar with the spread operator **Library Usage** There is no library being used in this benchmark. However, some benchmarks on MeasureThat.net might use libraries like `benchmark` to handle performance testing and comparison. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** In this case, there are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested. The focus is solely on the concatenation of arrays using two different methods. **Other Alternatives** If you want to compare other array concatenation methods or techniques, here are some alternatives: * Using `Array.prototype.reduce()`: This method can be used to concatenate arrays in a more functional programming style. * Using `Array.prototype.push()` and `Array.prototype.length` properties: This method involves creating a new array and pushing elements from the original arrays into it. Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as efficient or readable as the `concat()` method or spread operator.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
simple spread vs concat benchmark
unshift vs spread vs concat
.concat vs. spread
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?