Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
speedtest
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
substring vs slice
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var field = 'fieldname[]';
Tests:
substring
field.substring(field.length - 2);
slice
field.slice(0,-2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
substring
slice
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JavaScript expression that is executed to measure its performance. In this case, there are two test cases: 1. `field.substring(field.length - 2)` 2. `field.slice(0,-2)` Both expressions aim to extract a substring from the `field` variable. **Options compared** The benchmark compares the performance of two different string slicing approaches: * `substring`: The `substring()` method extracts a section of a string and returns it. * `slice`: The `slice()` method also extracts a section of a string, but it takes an optional start index and end index to define the slice. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of each approach: 1. **`substring()`**: * Pros: Simple and straightforward. It only requires the length of the substring. * Cons: May not be as efficient as `slice()` because it creates an intermediate result object. 2. **`slice()`**: * Pros: More flexible, allowing for optional start and end indices. * Cons: Requires specifying both start and end indices, which might lead to errors if not done correctly. In general, `slice()` is considered faster than `substring()`, especially when dealing with large strings or strings that are close to the edge (i.e., `length - 1`). **Library usage** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that `slice()` is a built-in method of JavaScript arrays and strings. **Special JS feature or syntax** There is an example of using square bracket notation `[ ]`, which is used to access array elements. In this case, the code uses `field[]` (implied by the JSON representation) to access the `field` variable as an array. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to compare performance with other string slicing approaches, you could consider using: 1. **`substr()`**: Similar to `substring()`, but it returns a string value instead of creating an intermediate result object. 2. **`String.prototype.slice()`**: A shorthand version of the `slice()` method that takes only two arguments: the start index and the end index. Keep in mind that performance differences between these methods might be negligible unless you're dealing with extremely large strings or performance-critical code. Overall, the benchmark is designed to compare the performance of `substring()` and `slice()` when extracting a substring from an array or string.
Related benchmarks:
Math speed test
Test speed of undefined
testtesttesttesttest
12123Test
String to number conversion in Vanilla JS + number to string
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?