Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array concat vs spread operator vs push to combine arrays
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method and push
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator vs Push
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var otherParams = ['a','b','c']; var final = otherParams.concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var otherParams = ['a','b','c']; var final = [ ...otherParams, ...params ]
Push
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var otherParams = ['a','b','c']; var final = otherParams.push(...params);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its results. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark compares three approaches to combine two arrays in JavaScript: `Array.prototype.concat`, the spread operator (`...`), and `push`. The benchmark aims to determine which approach is faster in various scenarios. **Approaches Compared** 1. **Array.prototype.concat**: This method concatenates two arrays by creating a new array with all elements from both input arrays. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This operator spreads the elements of one or more arrays onto another array, effectively combining them into a single array. 3. **Push**: This method adds one or more elements to the end of an array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Array.prototype.concat**: * Pros: Well-established, widely supported, and easy to understand. * Cons: Creates a new array, which can lead to increased memory usage and slower performance for large arrays. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: * Pros: More concise and expressive than `concat`, creates a new array, but faster due to the simplicity of the operation. * Cons: Less well-established, may not be supported in older browsers or environments with strict syntax checks. 3. **Push**: * Pros: Fastest approach as it modifies the original array in-place. * Cons: Requires an additional method call and may modify the original array, which can be unexpected behavior for some developers. **Library/Function Used** None are explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, the `Array.prototype.concat` method is a built-in JavaScript function, while the spread operator (`...`) is also a standard feature of modern JavaScript (introduced in ES6). **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a new feature introduced in ES6 (2015). It allows for more concise and expressive array manipulation. **Other Alternatives** If you need to combine arrays, some other alternatives include: * Using `Array.prototype.reduce()` method to concatenate two arrays. * Utilizing libraries like Lodash or Ramda for more functional programming approaches. * Employing a custom implementation using loops or recursive functions. It's essential to consider the specific requirements and constraints of your project when choosing an approach. If you need to optimize performance, using `push` might be the best choice. However, if you prioritize conciseness and readability, the spread operator (`...`) could be a better option.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Concat vs Spread (Two Arrays)
Array concat vs spread operator vs push with more data
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?