Benchmark: jQuery Perf Score Gaveia

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="idSelector"></div>
<div class="classSelector"></div>
<ul id="iteration">
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
    <li></li>
</ul>
<div id="cssGetter" style="color: black;"></div>
<div id="cssSetter" style="color: black;"></div>
<div id="find">
    <span></span>
    <div>
        <strong></strong>
    </div>
</div>

<script type="text/javascript" src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq112 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq224 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script>
  var $jq360 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>

Script Preparation code:

function tests($) {
  // Filter Next
  $('#iteration li').filter(':first').next();
  
  // Filter Prev
  $('#iteration li').filter(':last').prev();
  
  // Non-existant Class
  $('.someClass');
  
  // Non-existant ID
  $('#someID');
  
  // Find
  $('#find').find('strong');
  
  // Set color
  $('#cssSetter').css('color', 'red');
  
  // Get color
  $('#cssGetter').css('color');
  
  // Iteration
  $('#iteration li').each(function(i, e) {
    i++;
  });
  
  // Class selector
  $('.classSelector');
  
  // ID selector
  $('#idSelector');
}

Tests:

1.12.4
tests($jq112);
2.2.4
tests($jq224);
3.6.0
tests($jq360);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
1.12.4
2.2.4
3.6.0

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of JavaScript libraries like jQuery is essential for ensuring that the chosen library meets the requirements of your project.

**Benchmark Definition and Options**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition for testing the performance of different jQuery versions (1.12.4, 2.2.4, and 3.6.0). The options being compared are:

*   `tests($jq112)`: Tests the jQuery library version 1.12.4, which is an older version.
*   `tests($jq224)`: Tests the jQuery library version 2.2.4, which is another older version but slightly newer than 1.12.4.
*   `tests($jq360)`: Tests the jQuery library version 3.6.0, which is a relatively recent version.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

*   **Testing an older jQuery version (e.g., $jq112)**:
    *   Pros: Older versions might be more compatible with legacy codebases or specific requirements.
    *   Cons: Older versions may have outdated features or performance issues that are not relevant to newer projects.

*   **Testing a middle-aged jQuery version (e.g., $jq224)**:
    *   Pros: Middle-aged versions often strike a balance between compatibility and modern features, making them suitable for most projects.
    *   Cons: These versions may still have some outdated features or performance issues compared to newer versions.

*   **Testing the latest jQuery version (e.g., $jq360)**:
    *   Pros: Latest versions typically include the most up-to-date features and performance optimizations.
    *   Cons: Newer versions might break compatibility with older codebases or require more significant updates.

**Library Usage**

The provided benchmark definition uses the `$.noConflict(true)` method to create a new jQuery object, ensuring that it doesn't conflict with any existing libraries. This is particularly important when testing multiple library versions in the same environment.

**Other Considerations**

*   **Browser Support**: The benchmark results are for Chrome 101 on Mac OS X 10.15.7. It's essential to test across different browsers and platforms to ensure compatibility.
*   **Additional Features or Options**: The benchmark definition doesn't include any special JavaScript features or syntax that might affect the performance of the jQuery library.

**Alternatives**

If you need alternative benchmarks for testing other libraries, here are a few options:

1.  **Benchmarking libraries like Benchmark.js**: Benchmark.js provides a simple and easy-to-use API for creating benchmarks.
2.  **Google's jsPerf**: jsPerf is an old but still useful benchmarking tool that allows you to create and share benchmarks.
3.  **Modern testing frameworks like Jest or Mocha**: These frameworks provide built-in support for benchmarking and can be used in conjunction with other libraries.

Keep in mind that the choice of benchmarking library or framework depends on your project's specific requirements, your team's familiarity, and the level of complexity you're willing to handle.

Related benchmarks:

jQuery Perf Score Gaveia (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 1.12.4 vs 2.2.4 vs 3.6.0

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

1.12.4

2.2.4

3.6.0

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):