Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
length vs push
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
a vs b
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
a
const a = []; for (let i= 0; i<1000; ++i) { a.push(i); }
b
const b = []; for (let i= 0; i<1000; ++i) { b[b.length]=i; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
a
b
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: `push` and indexing (using `b[b.length]`) when adding elements to an array of length 1000. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Push**: This approach uses the `push()` method to add elements to the end of the array. 2. **Indexing**: This approach uses indexing (`b[b.length]`) to access and assign values to elements in the array. **Pros and Cons** * **Push**: + Pros: Simple, straightforward, and widely supported by JavaScript engines. + Cons: May lead to more garbage collection pauses due to frequent push operations, which can negatively impact performance. * **Indexing**: + Pros: Can be faster for large arrays since indexing allows the engine to avoid creating a new array and directly assigns values to existing elements. + Cons: Less intuitive and may require more memory accesses, leading to potential performance overhead. **Library** None of the test cases use any libraries. The benchmark only relies on JavaScript's built-in features. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There is no special feature or syntax being tested here. The tests are designed to demonstrate a fundamental comparison between two basic array operations in JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** To further compare performance, other approaches could be explored: * Using `splice()` instead of `push()` * Using `concat()` instead of indexing * Implementing the benchmark with `nativeArrayBuffer` and Web Workers (for parallel execution) * Using profiling tools or optimizing the code before running the benchmark **Additional Considerations** When designing benchmarks like this, it's essential to consider factors such as: * **Data size**: The test case uses an array of length 1000. Increasing the data size can reveal more significant performance differences between the two approaches. * **Browser and engine support**: Different browsers and JavaScript engines may exhibit varying behavior or optimization strategies for these operations. Running the benchmark with multiple browsers and engines can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the results. * **Garbage collection**: Garbage collection can impact performance when using `push()` since it creates temporary arrays during garbage collection cycles. The indexing approach might avoid this issue, but other factors like array resizing and element reallocation could introduce additional overhead. Keep in mind that benchmarks should be used as a starting point for understanding performance differences, not the only measure of optimization potential.
Related benchmarks:
Array spread vs. push performance
Pushing items via Array.push vs. Spread Operator
spread vs push - simple
spread vs push large
Spread vs Push -
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?