Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
ssssdsaddffvfggggfffdssffff
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
inner vs fragment
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
inner
const el = document.createElement('div'); document.documentElement.appendChild(el);
fragment
const fragment = document.createDocumentFragment(); const el = document.createElement('div'); fragment.appendChild(el); document.documentElement.appendChild(fragment);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
inner
fragment
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a string that represents a JavaScript function or operation to be measured. In this case, there are two benchmark definitions: 1. `const el = document.createElement('div');\r\ndocument.documentElement.appendChild(el);` 2. `const fragment = document.createDocumentFragment();\r\n\r\nconst el = document.createElement('div');\r\n\r\nfragment.appendChild(el);\r\ndocument.documentElement.appendChild(fragment);` These two definitions test the performance of creating a new HTML element and appending it to the document's root element, using two different approaches: **Approach 1: Creating a new DOM element directly** In this approach, a new `div` element is created using `document.createElement('div')`, and then appended to the `document.documentElement`. **Approach 2: Using a document fragment** In this approach, a new `fragment` object is created using `document.createDocumentFragment()`, an HTML element (`el`) is created using `document.createElement('div')`, and then appended to the `fragment`. Finally, the `fragment` is appended to the `document.documentElement`. **Comparison of approaches** The two approaches have different performance characteristics: * **Approach 1** has a lower overhead due to fewer DOM operations (only one element creation and append). * **Approach 2** involves an additional step of creating a fragment, which can lead to slightly higher overhead. Pros and Cons: * **Approach 1**: + Pros: Lower overhead, fewer DOM operations. + Cons: May not account for the benefits of using fragments in certain use cases (e.g., when multiple elements need to be appended). * **Approach 2**: + Pros: Can take advantage of fragment optimizations, such as caching and reuse. + Cons: Higher overhead due to additional DOM operations. **Library usage** Neither benchmark definition uses a specific library. However, the use of `document.createElement()` and `document.createDocumentFragment()` is related to the HTML DOM API, which is part of the Web Standards (ECMAScript). **Special JS feature or syntax** The provided benchmark definitions do not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard ECMAScript. **Other alternatives** To test similar performance characteristics, other approaches could be considered: * Using a virtual DOM library like React or Angular * Creating a custom wrapper element using a different DOM API (e.g., `div` with a custom attribute) * Using a benchmarking framework that provides additional features, such as automatic warm-up and caching. For example, using the `react-dom` library to create a React component: ```javascript import { createRef } from 'react'; const ref = createRef(); ref.current = document.createElement('div'); document.documentElement.appendChild(ref.current); ``` This would test the performance of creating a virtual DOM element and appending it to the real DOM.
Related benchmarks:
testje
for vs filter 1111
Lazy single quote regexp search
test dv vs fm real
RegEx vs Reduce
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?