Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
ssssdsaddffvf
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
inner vs fragment
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
inner
const el = document.createElement('div'); el.innerHTML = ` <h1>Heading</h1> <p>Paragraph 1</p> <p>Paragraph 2</p> <button>Button</button> <p>Paragraph 3</p> `; document.documentElement.appendChild(el);
fragment
const fragment = document.createDocumentFragment(); const el = document.createElement('div'); const heading = document.createElement('h1'); const para1 = document.createElement('p'); const para2 = document.createElement('p'); const button = document.createElement('button'); const para3 = document.createElement('p'); heading.innerText = 'Heading'; para1.innerText = 'Paragraph 1'; para2.innerText = 'Paragraph 2'; para3.innerText = 'Paragraph 3'; button.innerText = 'Button'; el.appendChild(para3) el.appendChild(heading); el.appendChild(para1); el.appendChild(para2); el.appendChild(button); fragment.appendChild(el); document.documentElement.appendChild(fragment);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
inner
fragment
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases, explaining what is tested, the options compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents the setup for the individual test cases. In this case, there are two test cases: "inner" and "fragment". The definition includes: * A brief description of the test (null in this case) * Script preparation code (null in this case) * HTML preparation code (null in this case) However, upon closer inspection, we can see that the script preparation code is actually the JavaScript code that defines the test case. In this case, both test cases create a simple DOM structure using `document.createElement` and append it to the document. **Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **"inner"`: * The benchmark definition is a single line of JavaScript code that creates a DOM element with an inner HTML string. * This code directly sets the inner HTML of the element, which means that only one operation (appending the HTML to the element) is performed. 2. **"fragment"`: * The benchmark definition is another single line of JavaScript code that creates a `documentFragment` and appends it to the document. * This code creates multiple elements (heading, paragraphs, button), sets their text content, and then appends them to the `documentFragment`, which is then appended to the document. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare different approaches: 1. **"inner"`: + Sets inner HTML directly on the element. + Only one operation (appending HTML) is performed. 2. **"fragment"`: + Uses a `documentFragment` to group multiple elements. + Multiple operations (creating, setting text content, appending to fragment, and finally appending to document) are performed. **Pros and Cons** **"inner"`: Pros: * Simple and straightforward approach * Only one operation is performed Cons: * May be slower due to the overhead of creating a new element with inner HTML set **"fragment"`: Pros: * More efficient, as the browser can batch updates to the document fragment before applying it to the final document * Can reduce DOM mutations, which may improve performance for some use cases Cons: * Adds more complexity and operations compared to the simple approach of setting inner HTML directly on the element * May require additional memory allocation for the `documentFragment` **Other Considerations** The choice between these two approaches depends on the specific requirements of your application. If you need a simple, straightforward solution with minimal overhead, "inner" might be suitable. However, if you're looking to optimize DOM updates and reduce mutation overhead, "fragment" could be a better choice. **Libraries Used** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, `document.createDocumentFragment()` is a built-in JavaScript method that creates a new fragment.
Related benchmarks:
testje
for vs filter 1111
Lazy single quote regexp search
test dv vs fm real
fddfdfdfdf
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?