Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.push() VS spread operator
(version: 0)
Array.prototype.push() VS spread operator
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.push() vs spread operator
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.push()
const arr = ["Juan"]; arr.push("Sanchez"); const result = arr
spread operator
let arr = ["Juan"]; arr = [...arr, "Sanchez"]; const result = arr
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.push()
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net is testing two approaches for adding elements to an array: 1. `Array.prototype.push()`: This method modifies the original array by appending one or more elements to its end. 2. Spread operator (`...`): This syntax creates a new array with all elements from the original array, and then adds one or more elements to it. **Options compared** The benchmark is comparing two options: * `Array.prototype.push()`: The traditional method of adding elements to an array using the `push()` method. * Spread operator (`...`): A concise syntax for creating a new array by spreading elements from an existing array, and then adding more elements to it. **Pros and cons of each approach** **Array.prototype.push():** Pros: * Native support in most JavaScript engines * Easy to use and understand * Optimized performance Cons: * Modifies the original array, which can be undesirable if you need to preserve the original data * Can lead to performance issues if used excessively **Spread operator (`...`):** Pros: * Creates a new array, preserving the original data * Concise syntax makes it easier to read and write code * Can improve performance in some cases (see below) Cons: * Requires JavaScript engines that support spread syntax (not all do) * May incur overhead due to array creation **Performance benefits** The spread operator can lead to better performance in certain scenarios: * When adding a large number of elements to an array, the spread operator may be faster because it avoids modifying the original array. * In modern JavaScript engines, the spread operator is often implemented using optimized algorithms that reduce overhead. However, this advantage only applies when the number of elements being added is significant. For small arrays or frequent additions, the `push()` method might still be faster due to its optimized implementation. **Library usage** Neither of the benchmark test cases uses a library. The spread operator is a native JavaScript syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Special JS features/syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark definition. **Other alternatives** If you need to add elements to an array, there are other approaches you could consider: * `concat()`: A method that creates a new array by concatenating two arrays. While it's not as concise as the spread operator, it can be useful when working with existing arrays. * `Array.from()`: A static method that creates a new array from an iterable (like an array or string). It can be used to add elements to an array in a more functional programming style. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and use cases compared to the spread operator and `push()` method.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator with length limit
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator on a bigger array
JS array spread operator vs push
Array .push() vs spread operator
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?