Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash flatmap long
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash.flatMap vs native
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.16.0/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var x = [1,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,2,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4] Array.prototype.flatMap = function(f) { return [].concat(...this.map(f)) }
Tests:
lodash.flatMap
_.flatMap(x,x => [x-1, x, x+1, x +2, x +2, x +2, x +2])
native
x.flatMap(x => [x-1, x, x+1, x +2, x +2, x +2, x +2])
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash.flatMap
native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition for a JavaScript function that flattens an array using either Lodash or the native `flatMap()` method. * **"Script Preparation Code":** This code snippet defines a custom implementation of the `Array.prototype.flatMap` method, which is then used as a test case. The implementation simply calls the original `map()` method and concatenates the results using the spread operator (`...`). This custom implementation is used to test the performance of Lodash's `flatMap` function. * **"Html Preparation Code":** This code snippet includes a script tag that loads the Lodash library version 4.16.0 from a CDN. The purpose of this code is to ensure that the Lodash library is available for use in the benchmark. **Individual Test Cases** The test cases are defined as an array of objects, each representing a separate test scenario: * **Test Case 1:** `_.flatMap(x,x => [x-1, x, x+1, x +2, x +2, x +2, x +2])` This test case uses the Lodash library's `flatMap` function to flatten an array of numbers. The `_` notation refers to the root object of the Lodash library. * **Test Case 2:** `x.flatMap(x => [x-1, x, x+1, x +2, x +2, x +2, x +2])` This test case uses the native `flatMap()` method on an array `x`. Note that this implementation does not use the Lodash library. **Comparison of Options** The two test cases compare the performance of using Lodash's `flatMap` function versus the native `flatMap()` method. The pros and cons of each approach are as follows: * **Lodash's `flatMap`:** + Pros: - Uses a widely-used and well-tested library. - Provides additional functionality and features beyond the native implementation. + Cons: - Introduces an external dependency, which can impact performance and security. - May incur overhead due to the use of a library. * **Native `flatMap()` method:** + Pros: - Does not introduce an external dependency, reducing potential performance issues. - Can be optimized for performance by the JavaScript engine. + Cons: - Requires implementation of the custom `Array.prototype.flatMap` method, which can add complexity. **Library and Its Purpose** The Lodash library is a popular utility library that provides a wide range of functional programming helpers, including array manipulation functions like `flatMap`. The purpose of using Lodash in this benchmark is to evaluate the performance difference between the native implementation and the widely-used library. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of the spread operator (`...`) in the custom implementation of `Array.prototype.flatMap` is a relatively recent feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Alternatives** If you want to write your own native `flatMap()` method or use a different library for array manipulation, here are some alternatives: * For a custom implementation: You can define a new function that takes an array and a callback function as arguments, and returns a new array with the results of calling the callback function on each element. * For a different library: There are many other utility libraries available, such as jQuery's `map()` and `filter()` methods or third-party libraries like Ramda. Keep in mind that using a native implementation or a custom library may require additional work to ensure compatibility with different browsers and environments.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash filter length vs sumby
map vs for: too much data
mapvalues reduce
lodash flatmap longest
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?