Benchmark: for-in vs for-of

Script Preparation code:

var DATA = {};
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
  DATA["some-property-name-" + i] = "some-property-value-" + i;
}

function PROCESS(property, value) {
}

Tests:

for-of
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(DATA)) { PROCESS(key, value); }
for-in
for (const key in DATA) { const value = DATA[key]; PROCESS(key, value); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for-of
for-in

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark on MeasureThat.net tests the performance difference between two approaches for iterating over an object in JavaScript: `for-in` and `for-of`.

In the provided JSON, we have a script that prepares a dataset (`DATA`) with 1000 properties, each containing a string value. The purpose of this dataset is to serve as input for the benchmark.

The test cases iterate over this dataset using two different approaches:

1. **for-in**: This approach uses the `in` operator to iterate over the object's property names.
2. **for-of**: This approach uses the `entries()` method on the `Object` prototype to iterate over an array of key-value pairs, which is then used with a `for...of` loop.

**Options compared**

The two options being compared are:

* `for-in`: Iterates directly over property names using the `in` operator.
* `for-of`: Iterates over key-value pairs as an array.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

* **for-in**:
	+ Pros:
		- Simple and widely supported.
		- No need to create an array or handle iterations manually.
	+ Cons:
		- May not be suitable for arrays or objects with complex structures, as it iterates over property names only.
		- Can lead to slower performance due to the overhead of checking each property name.
* **for-of**:
	+ Pros:
		- Suitable for arrays and objects with complex structures, as it iterates over key-value pairs.
		- Generally faster than `for-in` because it avoids the overhead of property name lookup.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires support for the `entries()` method on the `Object` prototype (introduced in ECMAScript 2015).
		- May require additional work to handle edge cases, such as iterating over sparse arrays.

**Library and special JS feature**

There is no external library being used in this benchmark. However, the use of the `for-of` loop relies on a special JavaScript feature: the **iterable protocol**, which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This protocol allows objects to be iterated over using methods like `entries()`.

**Other alternatives**

If you want to explore other approaches for iterating over an object, consider:

* Using `Object.keys()`, `Object.values()`, or `Object.entries()` directly, without a loop.
* Implementing a custom iterator using the `Symbol.iterator` property.
* Using a library like Lodash or Ramda, which provide utility functions for working with objects.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional complexity and performance overhead compared to the `for-in` and `for-of` approaches.

Related benchmarks:

for-in vs for-of (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: for-of vs for-in

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

for-of

for-in

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):