Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
filter vs some vs includes vs find
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
filter vs some vs includes vs find
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
filter
[1, 2, 3].filter(x => x === 3).length !== 0
some
[1, 2, 3].some(x => x === 3)
includes
[1, 2, 3].includes(3)
find
[1, 2, 3].find(x => x === 3) !== undefined
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
filter
some
includes
find
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
4 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:146.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/146.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 146 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
filter
40865280.0 Ops/sec
some
65025168.0 Ops/sec
includes
40695216.0 Ops/sec
find
60581396.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Array find vs includes
filter vs some
filter vs some vs includes
find vs includes vs indexof
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?