Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
push-vs-push-many1
(version: 2)
Comparing performance of:
1 vs 2 vs 3
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var b = [4, 5, 6, 7] var b0 = 4 var b1 = 5 var b2 = 6 var b3 = 7
Tests:
1
var a = [1, 2, 3] a.push(b0) a.push(b1) a.push(b2) a.push(b3)
2
var a = [1, 2, 3] a.push(b0, b1, b2, b3)
3
var a = [1, 2, 3] a.push.apply(a, b)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
1
2
3
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of JavaScript operations is crucial for developers to ensure their code runs efficiently across various browsers and environments. The provided JSON represents three test cases that compare different approaches to push elements onto an array in JavaScript. Here's a breakdown of what's being tested: **Test Case 1:** ```javascript var a = [1, 2, 3] a.push(b0) a.push(b1) a.push(b2) a.push(b3) ``` This test case uses the `push()` method to add elements to an array. The `push()` method takes one or more arguments and adds them to the end of the array. **Test Case 2:** ```javascript var a = [1, 2, 3] a.push(b0, b1, b2, b3) ``` This test case uses the spread operator (`...`) to add multiple elements to an array. The `push()` method is called with an array literal containing the four elements. **Test Case 3:** ```javascript var a = [1, 2, 3] a.push.apply(a, b) ``` This test case uses the `apply()` method to apply an array of arguments to the `push()` method. The `apply()` method calls the function with an array of arguments. Now, let's discuss the pros and cons of each approach: 1. **`push()` method**: This is a simple and straightforward way to add elements to an array. * Pros: Efficient, widely supported, and easy to use. * Cons: Can be slower than other approaches for large arrays, as it involves creating a new array with the added elements. 2. **Spread operator (`...`)**: This approach is concise and expressive, making it easier to add multiple elements to an array. * Pros: Fast, readable, and modern syntax. * Cons: Not supported in older browsers or environments that don't support ES6+ features. 3. **`apply()` method**: This approach is a bit more verbose but can be efficient for large arrays. * Pros: Can be faster than the `push()` method for large arrays, as it avoids creating a new array. * Cons: Less readable and more prone to errors due to its complexity. Other considerations: * **Array construction**: When adding elements to an array, consider using a temporary array or other data structure to minimize memory allocation and garbage collection overhead. * **Caching**: If the same elements are added repeatedly, consider caching them in a variable to avoid repeated allocations. * **Browser support**: Ensure that your code works across different browsers and environments. In this specific benchmark, the `apply()` method performs slightly better than the `push()` method, while the spread operator approach is not supported by older browsers. The results indicate that the best approach depends on the specific use case, browser support requirements, and performance considerations. As for special JS features or syntax, none are mentioned in this example.
Related benchmarks:
Arrays: spread operator vs push
Spread vs Push to Same Array v1
Pushing items via Array.push vs. Spread Operator
spread vs push set creation
spread vs push - simple
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?