Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread Operator vs Apply (with Max/Min)
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Max - Apply vs Max - Spread Operator vs Min - Apply vs Min - Spread Operator
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<html> </html>
Script Preparation code:
const dayTemperatures = [30, 29, 27, 26, 25];
Tests:
Max - Apply
const dayTemperatures = [30, 29, 27, 26, 25]; Math.max.apply(dayTemperatures);
Max - Spread Operator
const dayTemperatures = [30, 29, 27, 26, 25]; Math.max(...dayTemperatures);
Min - Apply
const dayTemperatures = [30, 29, 27, 26, 25]; Math.min.apply(dayTemperatures);
Min - Spread Operator
const dayTemperatures = [30, 29, 27, 26, 25]; Math.max(...dayTemperatures);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Max - Apply
Max - Spread Operator
Min - Apply
Min - Spread Operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. The provided benchmark definition and test cases are testing two approaches to find the maximum or minimum value in an array: using the `apply` method versus the spread operator (`...`). We'll explore each approach, their pros and cons, and other considerations. **Approach 1: Using `apply` method** In this approach, we use the `Math.max.apply(dayTemperatures)` or `Math.min.apply(dayTemperatures)` syntax to find the maximum or minimum value in the `dayTemperatures` array. The `apply` method calls a function with a given this value and an array of arguments. Pros: * This approach is often used when we need to pass a context object (the `this` value) to the function, which can be useful in certain scenarios. * It's a more explicit way of calling the maximum or minimum function, making it easier to understand the intent behind the code. Cons: * The `apply` method can be slower than other approaches because it involves creating a new function object and passing the context object and arguments separately. * This approach is less efficient compared to using the spread operator, especially when dealing with large arrays. **Approach 2: Using spread operator (`...`)** In this approach, we use the spread operator (`Math.max(...dayTemperatures)` or `Math.min(...dayTemperatures)`) to find the maximum or minimum value in the `dayTemperatures` array. The spread operator creates a new array from the elements of the original array. Pros: * This approach is generally faster than using the `apply` method because it avoids creating an intermediate function object and passing context arguments. * It's a more concise way to find the maximum or minimum value, making the code easier to read and write. Cons: * The spread operator can be less explicit about the intent behind the code, especially when dealing with complex functions that involve multiple operations. * This approach assumes that the array contains at least one element. If the array is empty, using the spread operator will result in an error or undefined behavior. **Other considerations** When choosing between these approaches, consider the following factors: * Performance: If speed is critical, using the spread operator might be a better choice. * Code readability and maintainability: Using the `apply` method can make the code more explicit and easier to understand, while the spread operator can lead to less readable code if not used carefully. * Context: If you need to pass a context object to the function, using the `apply` method might be a better choice. **Library usage** The provided benchmark script uses the built-in `Math.max` and `Math.min` functions. These are part of the JavaScript standard library and do not require any additional libraries. **Special JS features or syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark that requires specific knowledge to understand. **Alternatives** If you want to compare other approaches, consider the following: * Using `Array.prototype.reduce()` instead of `Math.max` or `Math.min`. * Implementing a custom function to find the maximum or minimum value using loops or recursion. * Using a library like Lodash that provides utility functions for finding maximum and minimum values in arrays. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics, code readability, or context requirements compared to the original approach.
Related benchmarks:
Spread Operator: Array
math.max.apply vs math.max(...)
Math.min.apply vs spread operator
Array push vs spread operator 2.0
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?