Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread20211
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
1 vs 2
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
1
var params = [ "hello", true, 7, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
2
var params = [ "hello", true, 7, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ]; var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
1
2
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring JavaScript performance is crucial to ensure efficient and fast execution of code. Let's break down the provided benchmark definition, test cases, and latest results. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition represents a piece of code that defines a microbenchmark. In this case, there are two test cases: 1. `var params = [ "hello", true, 7, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ];\r\nvar other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);` 2. `var params = [ "hello", true, 7, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ];\r\nvar other = [ 1, 2, ...params ];` **Options being compared** The two test cases differ in how they spread the elements of the `params` array into the `other` array: 1. Test Case 1 uses `.concat()`, which concatenates the arrays and creates a new array. 2. Test Case 2 uses the spread operator (`...`) to directly spread the elements of `params` into the `other` array. **Pros and Cons** * `.concat()`: + Pros: Easy to understand, widely supported, and works in older browsers that don't support the spread operator. + Cons: Creates a new array, which can lead to performance issues for large datasets. * Spread Operator (`...`): + Pros: More efficient than `.concat()`, as it avoids creating a new array. It's also more concise and modern syntax. + Cons: Less widely supported in older browsers (before Chrome 45). May not work in strict mode. **Library/Library Purpose** None of the test cases use any libraries. **Special JavaScript Feature/Syntax** The spread operator (`...`) is a new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015. It allows for more concise and efficient way to create new arrays by spreading elements from an existing array or object. **Other alternatives** If you want to avoid using the spread operator, you can also use the `Array.prototype.push.apply()` method to achieve the same result: ```javascript var params = [ "hello", true, 7, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ]; var other = []; params.forEach((element) => { other.push(element); }); ``` This approach is less efficient than using the spread operator but still viable for older browsers that don't support it. In summary, the benchmark compares two approaches to spreading elements into an array: `.concat()` and the spread operator (`...`). The latter is more efficient and modern syntax but has limited browser support. The alternative `push.apply()` method provides a compromise between efficiency and browser support.
Related benchmarks:
validate bignumber.js big.js shiftedBy
number floor format
lose precision solution
lose precision solution1
Apply vs spread 23355235
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?