Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
No return vs implicit void return
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Closure vs Arrow function
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Closure
var msg = "test"; var say = () => { console.log(msg); } say();
Arrow function
this.msg = "test"; var say = () => console.log(this.msg); say();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Closure
Arrow function
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark being tested on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is testing two different approaches in JavaScript: **No return vs implicit void return**. The script preparation code is empty, indicating that no additional setup or initialization code is needed for the test. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **No Return**: In this approach, the function `say()` returns `undefined` (or implicitly, since there's no explicit return statement). This means that when you call `say()`, it simply executes and does not provide a value that can be retrieved. 2. **Implicit Void Return**: Here, the function `say()` returns `void`, meaning that it doesn't explicitly return any value. However, due to how JavaScript handles functions with no explicit return statements, this also leads to an implicit return of `undefined`. This difference might seem minor, but as we'll see later, it can lead to performance variations. **Pros and Cons** * **No Return (Implicit Void Return)**: * Pros: Can be beneficial for simplicity and readability when working with functions that don't need a specific value returned. However, since both options have an implicit return of `undefined`, this might not be the most meaningful distinction for performance testing. * Cons: Since there's no explicit return statement, it can lead to confusion in code analysis tools or debugging environments. * **Options Comparison**: * Pros: Allows developers to understand and compare the performance impact of different JavaScript implementation details. * Cons: Could introduce unnecessary complexity for simple use cases, as the distinction between these two options might not be significant unless explicitly considered (like in this specific benchmark). **Library and Special Features** There are no libraries used in this benchmark. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The test case uses **Arrows functions**, which were introduced in ECMAScript 2015. Arrows functions provide a concise syntax for defining small, one-time use functions without declaring them as full-fledged functions using the `function` keyword. This syntax has both advantages and disadvantages compared to traditional function definitions: * Advantages: * Simpler syntax * Can be useful in certain situations where you only need a small, single-purpose function. * Disadvantages: * Less control over function behavior (for example, capturing variables or creating closures). * Generally less compatible with older browsers. **Other Alternatives** If the benchmark were testing for performance differences in other JavaScript implementation details or features, alternatives might include: 1. **Async vs Sync**: Comparing code execution time when dealing with asynchronous versus synchronous operations. 2. **ES Modules (Import/Export)**: Testing the overhead of importing and exporting modules compared to traditional script inclusion methods. However, for this specific benchmark focusing on the distinction between no return statements versus implicit void returns in JavaScript functions, the provided setup is well-suited for the analysis at hand.
Related benchmarks:
Return true vs empty body
Return true vs empty body
Return true vs empty body
Return true vs empty body
Return true vs return;
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?