Benchmark: zzzzzzzz - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:


function getRoute(tickets) {
  let res = "";
  let destinations = tickets.map((t) => t[1]);
  console.log(destinations);
  for (const [source, dest] of tickets) {
    if (!destinations.includes(source)) {
      res += `${source},${dest}`;
      return getNext(tickets, res, dest);
    }
  }
  return res;
  // return 'USA,BRA,UAE,JPN,PHL'; // implement logic here
}

function getNext(tickets, res, nextDest) {
  if (!nextDest) {
    let destinations = tickets.map((t) => t[1]);
    for (const [source, dest] of tickets) {
      if (!destinations.includes(source)) {
        res += `${source},${dest}`;
        return getNext(tickets, res, dest);
      }
    }
  } else {
    for (const [source, dest] of tickets) {
      if (nextDest === source) {
        res += `,${dest}`;
        return getNext(tickets, res, dest);
      }
    }
  }
  return res;
}

Tests:

aaaaaaaaa
const result = getRoute([ ["JPN", "PHL"], ["BRA", "UAE"], ["USA", "BRA"], ["UAE", "JPN"] ]); console.log(result);
bbbbbbbbbbbbb
const result = getRoute([ ["JPN", "PHL"], ["BRA", "UAE"], ["UAE", "JPN"], ["PHL", "USA"] ]); console.log(result);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
aaaaaaaaa
bbbbbbbbbbbbb

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Overview**

MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON represents two benchmark definitions, which are used to test the performance of different approaches for a specific use case.

**Benchmark Definition**

The first benchmark definition represents a function called `getRoute`, which takes an array of ticket arrays as input and returns a string representing the route between destinations. The function uses a recursive approach to find the shortest route.

**Options Compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **Sequential Approach**: This approach involves processing each ticket individually, without considering any intermediate results.
2. **Memoized Approach**: This approach involves storing intermediate results in a cache (not shown in the provided code) and reusing them when necessary to avoid redundant calculations.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Sequential Approach**:
	+ Pros: Easy to implement, straightforward logic.
	+ Cons: Inefficient due to redundant calculations and lack of caching.
* **Memoized Approach**:
	+ Pros: More efficient by avoiding redundant calculations, potential for better performance.
	+ Cons: Requires additional memory to store cache, more complex implementation.

**Library**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided code. However, the use of recursive functions (`getNext`) suggests that the developer may have used a JavaScript engine or interpreter that optimizes recursive function calls (e.g., V8.js).

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

None are explicitly mentioned in the provided code.

**Other Considerations**

* **Cache**: The memoized approach relies on caching intermediate results to avoid redundant calculations. This can significantly improve performance but also increases memory usage.
* **Optimization**: The sequential approach may be optimized using various techniques, such as loop unrolling or caching, which are not evident in the provided code.

**Alternatives**

Some alternative approaches for optimizing the `getRoute` function might include:

1. Iterative algorithms instead of recursive ones.
2. Using a graph library (e.g., NetworkX) to represent the tickets and destinations.
3. Utilizing Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation or ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation for better performance.

These alternatives may offer different trade-offs between complexity, memory usage, and performance.

Related benchmarks:

zzzzzzzz (version: 0)

zzzzzzzzzz

Comparing performance of: aaaaaaaaa vs bbbbbbbbbbbbb

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

aaaaaaaaa

bbbbbbbbbbbbb

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):